IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iffp19/42452.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Two Opportunities to Deliver on the Doha Development Pledge

Author

Listed:
  • Bouet, Antoine
  • Mevel, Simon
  • Orden, David

Abstract

In this brief, we evaluate the effects of a possible Doha agreement based on proposals currently on the table from the United States, the European Union, and the Group of Twenty (G20). We first begin with a basic scenario that represents a compromise between the more and less ambitious aspects of these proposals.1 As assessed in the MIRAGE general equilibrium model of the world economy, this basic scenario yields a global income gain of $54.7 billion, or about one-fourth of the global income gains that are estimated from full trade liberalization.2 Gains are distributed among countries in a slightly progressive manner but are largely proportional to initial income shares, so the LDCs gain only a paltry $1.0 billion. We next consider two specific development-oriented modifications to the basic scenario. These modified scenarios demonstrate that more can be done to benefit poor countries. In the first alternative scenario, free access of LDCs to wealthy-country OECD markets is increased from 97 percent to 100 percent, as proposed by the European Union. This raises world income by an additional $14.3 billion. Nearly half of these additional gains go to the LDCs, and the increase of their income rises dramatically, to $7.0 billion. In the second scenario, the number of sensitive and special products exempted from the agricultural tariff formula in the basic scenario is reduced from 5 percent of tariff lines to 1 percent, as proposed by the United States. This raises world income an additional $7.3 billion compared to the basic scenario. The additional gains are distributed widely among countries, and are beneficial among heterogeneous developing countries especially to those where agriculture is an important source of employment and export earnings. Though this scenario has the advantage of providing a multilateral, nonpreferential improvement to the basic scenario, gains are limited because the tariff cuts applied to nonsensitive agricultural products in the basic scenario are not very ambitious.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:iffp19:42452
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42452
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42452/files/rb06.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42452?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iffp19:42452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.