IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/37331.html

Contract and Exit Decisions in Finisher Hog Production

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Fengxia
  • Hennessy, David A.
  • Jensen, Helen H.

Abstract

Finisher hog production in North America has seen a shift toward larger production units and contract-organized production since around 1990. Given the efficiency gains and conversion costs associated with contract production, growers may have to choose between long-term commitment through investments and atrophy with intent to exit in the intermediate term. A model is developed to show that growers with any of three efficiency attributes (lower innate hazard of exit, variable costs, or fixed contract adoption costs) are not only more likely to contract but will also produce more and expend more on lowering business survival risks. Using the 2004 U.S. Agricultural Resource Management Survey for hogs, a recursive bivariate probit model is estimated in which exit is affected directly and also indirectly through the contract decision. It is confirmed that contracting producers are less likely to exit. Greater specialization and regional effects are important in increasing the probability of contracting. More education, having non-farm income, and older production facilities are significant factors in increasing the expected rate of exit. The findings suggest further exits by non-contract producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Fengxia & Hennessy, David A. & Jensen, Helen H., 2008. "Contract and Exit Decisions in Finisher Hog Production," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 37331, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:37331
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.37331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/37331/files/08-WP_469_Dong-Hennessy-Jensen.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.37331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:37331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.