IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/18573.html

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through Energy Crops in the United States with Implications for Asian-Pacific Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Schneider, Uwe A.
  • McCarl, Bruce A.

Abstract

Agriculture-based biofuels have the potential to replace fossil fuels, thereby offsetting greenhouse gas emissions. We estimate emission abatement supply curves from energy crops switchgrass, hybrid poplar, and willow under a wide range of sectorwide greenhouse gas emission reduction incentives in U.S. agriculture. The Agricultural Sector Model employed captures market interactions of biofuel production with traditional agricultural production and with alternative emission mitigation strategies. U.S. results suggest an increasing importance of biomass-based electricity for carbon mitigation incentives above an economic threshold of $50 per ton. At incentive levels of $170 per ton and higher, emission offsets from energy crops provide the highest net emission reduction among all agricultural options. To extrapolate U.S. findings and assess the economic viability of energy crops in Asian Pacific countries, we conducted a sensitivity analysis on key parameters of the U.S. model. We find implementation of energy crops to be highly sensitive to biomass yields and agricultural land base. While U.S. crop yields can be matched in warm tropical climates, the available agricultural land base per capita is much smaller in most Asian-Pacific countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2001. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through Energy Crops in the United States with Implications for Asian-Pacific Countries," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18573, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18573
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18573/files/wp060274.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCarl, Bruce A. & Schneider, Uwe A., 1999. "Curbing Greenhouse Gases: Agriculture's Role," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(01), pages 1-4.
    2. Ching-Cheng Chang & Bruce A. McCarl & James W. Mjelde & James W. Richardson, 1992. "Sectoral Implications of Farm Program Modifications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(1), pages 38-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uwe A. Schneider & Bruce A. McCarl & Richard Woodward, 2001. "Harvesting the Greenhouse through Altered Land Management: Economic Potential and Market Design Challenges," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 01-wp288, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2001. "Economic Potential of Biomass-Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18420, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    3. Uwe Schneider & Bruce McCarl, 2003. "Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(4), pages 291-312, April.
    4. Singh, O.P. & Singh, H.P. & Badal, P.S. & Singh, Rakesh & Pandey, Divya, 2010. "Impact of Resource Conservation Technologies on Carbon Emission in Major Wheat Growing Regions of India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 65(3), pages 1-14.
    5. McCarl, Bruce A., 1992. "Mathematical Programming For Resource Policy Appraisal Under Multiple Objectives," Working Papers 11888, Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Training Project.
    6. Xiaoyong CAO & Chih-Chun KUNG & Yuelong WANG, 2017. "An environmental and economic evaluation of carbon sequestration from pyrolysis and biochar application in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 569-578.
    7. Elbakidze, Levan & McCarl, Bruce A., 2007. "Sequestration offsets versus direct emission reductions: Consideration of environmental co-effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 564-571, January.
    8. Kung, Chih-Chun & Wu, Tao, 2021. "Influence of water allocation on bioenergy production under climate change: A stochastic mathematical programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Kung, Chih-Chun & Zhang, Ning, 2015. "Renewable energy from pyrolysis using crops and agricultural residuals: An economic and environmental evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1532-1544.
    10. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A. & Schmid, Erwin, 2007. "Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 128-140, May.
    11. Aillery, Marcel P. & et al. [+7], 1996. "Salmon Recovery in the Pacific Northwest: Agricultural and other Economic Effects," Agricultural Economic Reports 308431, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2002. "The Potential Of U.S. Agriculture And Forestry To Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Agricultural Sector Analysis," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18409, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    13. Williams, Jeffery R. & Nelson, Richard G. & Aller, Taryn D. & Claassen, Mark M. & Rice, Charles W., 2002. "Derived Carbon Credit Values For Carbon Sequestration: Do Co2 Emissions From Production Inputs Matter ?," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19798, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Ching-Cheng Chang, 1999. "Carbon sequestration cost by afforestation in Taiwan," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(3), pages 199-213, September.
    15. Uwe A. Schneider & Michael Obersteiner & Erwin Schmid & Bruce A. McCarl, 2007. "Agricultural adaptation to climate policies under technical change," Working Papers FNU-133, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jan 2008.
    16. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A. & Murray, Brian C. & Williams, Jimmy R. & Sands, Ronald D., 2001. "Economic Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: Comparative Role for Soil Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18378, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    17. Schneider, Uwe A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2005. "Implications of a Carbon-Based Energy Tax for U.S. Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 265-279, October.
    18. Ralph Alig & Darius Adams & Bruce McCarl & J. Callaway & Steven Winnett, 1997. "Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(3), pages 259-274, April.
    19. Kung, Chih-Chun & Cao, Xiaoyong & Choi, Yongrok & Kung, Shan-Shan, 2019. "A stochastic analysis of cropland utilization and resource allocation under climate change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. HUBERT Marie-Hélène & MOREAUX Michel, 2007. "The challenge of meeting the future food needs," LERNA Working Papers 07.17.238, LERNA, University of Toulouse.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.