IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/18483.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing Consumers' Valuation of Cosmetically Damaged Apples Using a Mixed Probit Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yue, Chengyan
  • Jensen, Helen H.
  • Mueller, Daren S.
  • Nonnecke, Gail R.
  • Gleason, Mark L.

Abstract

A mixed probit model was applied to survey data to analyze consumers' willingness to buy apples with cosmetic damage caused by the sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS) disease complex. The analysis finds consumers will pay a premium for organic production methods and for apples with low amounts of SBFS damage. Behavioral variables such as experience in growing fruit significantly affect the willingness to buy apples of different damage levels. Consumers' tolerance of very blemished apples is limited and they trade off production technology attributes for cosmetic appearance. Better understanding of this trade-off is important to organic producers' decisions about disease control.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18483
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18483
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18483/files/wp050419.pdf
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18483?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.