IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/18411.html

Global Agricultural Trade And The Doha Round: What Are The Implications For North And South?

Author

Listed:
  • Beghin, John C.
  • Roland-Holst, David W.
  • van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique

Abstract

The next three-year World Trade Organization round has been set in motion by recent negotiations in Doha, Qatar. Among the most contentious issues in that meeting, and probably over the course of the next round, is direct and indirect producer support for agricultural exporters in the North and forgone production, employment, and trading opportunities for farmers in the South. Our results indicate that real commitments to reduce agricultural support in high-income countries will induce substantial changes in world food prices and domestic agricultural rates of return and output and will cause dramatic shifts in agricultural trade patterns. Total trade expands and real output, wages, and incomes in developing countries, especially among the rural poor, increase substantially. In particular, rural incomes in low- and middle-income countries increase by over $60 billion, a figure that comfortably exceeds even the most ambitious goals for increased development assistance and represents a substantial savings to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) taxpayers. At the same time, European Union and Japanese agricultural exports fall sharply and their imports rise. Other OECD countries see more balanced aggregate trade growth, but a number of strategic sectors are still adversely affected. These facts are likely to complicate negotiations in the Doha Round significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Beghin, John C. & Roland-Holst, David W. & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2002. "Global Agricultural Trade And The Doha Round: What Are The Implications For North And South?," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18411, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18411
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18411/files/wp020308.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Hoekman & Kym Anderson, 2000. "Developing-Country Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(1), pages 171-180.
    2. John C. Beghin & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Sung Joon Park, 2003. "Food Security and Agricultural Protection in South Korea," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(3), pages 618-632.
    3. Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry L. & Agapi, Somwaru, 2002. "Developing Countries Interests In Agricultural Reforms Under The World Trade Organization," TMD Discussion Papers 16321, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Martin,Will & Winters,L. Alan (ed.), 1996. "The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586016, January.
    5. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Brink, Lars & Dyck, John H. & MacLaren, Donald, 2001. "Domestic Support: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14622, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    6. Xinshen Diao & Terry Roe & Agapi Somwaru, 2002. "Developing Country Interests in Agricultural Reforms under the World Trade Organization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 782-790.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John C. Beghin & David Roland-Holst & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2002. "Global Agricultural Trade and the Doha Round: What are the Implications for North and South?," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 02-wp308, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Beghin, John C. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F., 2002. "The Doha Round Of The World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization Of Agricultural Markets," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18611, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    3. Bruce A. Babcock & John C. Beghin & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Stephane De Cara & Amani Elobeid & Cheng Fang & Chad E. Hart & Murat Isik & Holger Matthey & Alexander E. Saak & Karen Kovarik & FAPRI Staff, 2002. "Doha Round of the World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization of Agricultural Markets, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp317, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Jay Fabiosa & John Beghin & Amani Elobeid & Holger Matthey & Alexander Saak & Stéphane de Cara & Cheng Fang & Murat Isik & Pat Westhoff & D. Scott Brown & Brian Willott & Daniel Madison & Seth Meyer &, 2005. "The Doha Round of the World Trade Organization and Agricultural Markets Liberalization: Impacts on Developing Economies," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 317-335.
    5. Hewitt, Joanna, 2008. "Impact evaluation of research by the International Food Policy Research Institute on agricultural trade liberalization, developing countries, and WTO's Doha negotiations," Impact Assessment Discussion Papers 48848, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Trade Liberalization, Agriculture, and Poverty in Low-income Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations And Competitiveness," Working Papers 19100, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    8. Hewitt, Joanna, 2008. "Impact evaluation of research by the International Food Policy Research Institute on agricultural trade liberalization, developing countries, and WTO's Doha negotiations:," Impact assessments 28, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Ka Yi Fung, 2017. "How Economic Dependency Was Created Through the WTO: A Case Study of South Korea," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(4), pages 469-487, December.
    10. Colyer, Dale, 2004. "Environmental Regulations and Agricultural Competitiveness," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(01), pages 1-17.
    11. Diao, Xinshen & Yanoma, Yukitsugu, 2003. "Exploring Regional Dynamics In Sub-Saharan African Agriculture," DSGD Discussion Papers 16173, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Kym Anderson, 2005. "Agricultural trade reform and poverty reduction in developing countries," Chapters, in: Sisira Jayasuriya (ed.), Trade Policy Reforms and Development, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. James Rude & Karl D. Meilke, 2002. "Two Unknowns and No Equations: Implications of the Doha Declaration for Canadian Agricultural Policy," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(4), pages 415-437, December.
    14. repec:ocp:rtrade:pb1744 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sébastien Jean & David Laborde & Will Martin, 2008. "Choosing Sensitive Agricultural Products in Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 2008-18, CEPII research center.
    16. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    17. Siebert, Horst, 2005. "TAFTA - a dead horse or an attractive open club?," Kiel Working Papers 1240, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    18. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    19. Debapriya Bhattacharya & Mustafizur Rahman & Rashed A.M. Titumir, 2000. "Setting The Agenda For The Next Wto Round: Perspectives From Bangladesh On The Seattle Ministerial," CPD Working Paper 3, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    20. Götz, Christian & Heckelei, Thomas & Rudloff, Bettina, 2010. "What makes countries initiate WTO disputes on food-related issues?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 154-162, April.
    21. William Edmondson & Matthew Shane & Agapi Somwaru, 2007. "Global Macroeconomic Shocks and U.S. Agriculture: An Interactive Matrix Approach," EcoMod2007 23900022, EcoMod.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.