IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi15/209227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Should The Market Actors Change Their Business Models After Trade Liberalization: A Case Study From Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Aouinait, Camille

Abstract

Since a few decades, both developed and developing countries are facing increasing burdens on environmental resources, institutional, political and economic changes. The liberalization is most seen as positive to enhance farmers and smallholders’ incomes at first. Switzerland is under pressure regarding the trade of commodities. The imported products have lower prices than indigenous products. This might induce a lower competitiveness of the sector. Therefore, the market dynamics could change and so the behavior of the market players; farmers, transformers, wholesalers and retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Aouinait, Camille, 2015. "How Should The Market Actors Change Their Business Models After Trade Liberalization: A Case Study From Switzerland," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209227, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi15:209227
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.209227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/209227/files/P1-204-Aouinait-HOW_SHOULD_THE_MARKET_ACTORS_CHANGE_THEIR_BUSINESS_MODELS_AFTER_TRADE_LIBERALIZATION.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.209227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi15:209227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.