IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi13/156218.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Process and Constraint Analysis of Paraprofessionals Regulation and Legalization: The Case of Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Ayenah, Fanka
  • Ilukor, John
  • Birner, Regina

Abstract

This study was set to examine the constraints of integrating paraprofessionals to the formal veterinary system in Uganda. The research design adopted in this study was qualitative. Process Influence-Net Map, pair-wise ranking and matrix scoring tools were used. Results show lack of political will, inadequate finance, weak veterinary institutions. The study reveals the best integration approach as the moderate integration system. It recommends that for paraprofessionals to be integrated as part of the veterinary system; the Veterinary Surgeon Act and paraprofessional bill needs to be passed, the Uganda veterinary board should be strengthened, veterinary service providers should be organized and trained.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayenah, Fanka & Ilukor, John & Birner, Regina, 2013. "Process and Constraint Analysis of Paraprofessionals Regulation and Legalization: The Case of Uganda," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156218, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi13:156218
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.156218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/156218/files/Poster5-Fanka-Process_c.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.156218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi13:156218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.