IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fcnddp/16419.html

The Cost Of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: A Comparative Analysis Of Three Programs In Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Caldes, Natalia
  • Coady, David P.
  • Maluccio, John A.

Abstract

A common criticism of antipoverty programs is that the high share of administrative (nontransfer) costs substantially reduces their effectiveness in alleviating poverty. Yet there is surprisingly little hard empirical evidence on such programs' costs. A recent international review of targeted poverty alleviation programs in less developed countries found cost information--which was rarely comparable between studies--for fewer than one-third of the programs examined. Improved information and a better understanding of the costs of such programs are crucial for effective policymaking. This study proposes and implements a methodology for a comparative analysis of the level and structure of costs of three similar poverty alleviation programs in Latin America, in order to assess their cost-efficiency. The findings underscore that any credible assessment of cost-efficiency requires a detailed analysis of program cost structures that goes well beyond simply providing aggregate cost information.

Suggested Citation

  • Caldes, Natalia & Coady, David P. & Maluccio, John A., 2004. "The Cost Of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: A Comparative Analysis Of Three Programs In Latin America," FCND Discussion Papers 16419, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16419
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16419/files/fc040174.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maluccio, John A. & Flores, Rafael, 2004. "Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social," FCND discussion papers 184, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Newman, John & Rawlings, Laura & Gertler, Paul, 1994. "Using Randomized Control Designs in Evaluating Social Sector Programs in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 9(2), pages 181-201, July.
    3. Hoddinott, John & Skoufias, Emmanuel, 2004. "The Impact of PROGRESA on Food Consumption," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(1), pages 37-61, October.
    4. Coady, David, 2001. "An evaluation of the distributional power of PROGRESA's cash transfers in Mexico," FCND discussion papers 117, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Behrman, Jere R. & Sengupta, Piyali & Todd, Petra, 2001. "Progressing Through Progresa: An Impact Assessment Of A School Subsidy Experiment," PROGRESA Reports 16011, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Coady, David P., 2001. "An evaluation of the distributional power of PROGRESA's cash transfers in Mexico," FCND briefs 117, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Coady, David & Perez, Raul & Vera-Ilamas, Hadid, 2004. "Evaluating the cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: an illustration based on PROGRESA in Mexico," FCND discussion papers 174, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caldes, Natalia & Coady, David & Maluccio, John A., 2006. "The cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: A comparative analysis of three programs in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 818-837, May.
    2. Coady, David & Perez, Raul & Vera-Ilamas, Hadid, 2004. "Evaluating the cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: an illustration based on PROGRESA in Mexico," FCND discussion papers 174, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Bos, Maria Soledad & Brown, Mary Ashby & Cline, Sarah A. & Cohen, Marc J. & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul & Rosegrant, Mark W. & von Braun, Joachim, 2005. "New risks and opportunities for food security: scenario analyses for 2015 and 2050," 2020 vision discussion papers 39, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Manley, James & Gitter, Seth & Slavchevska, Vanya, 2013. "How Effective are Cash Transfers at Improving Nutritional Status?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 133-155.
    5. Gustavo J. Bobonis, 2011. "The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(2), pages 281-312.
    6. Neha Kumar, 2007. "Pro-Poor Targeting and Participatory Governance: Evidence from Central India," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-176, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    7. Seth R. Gitter & Bradford L. Barham, 2008. "Women's Power, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Schooling in Nicaragua," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 22(2), pages 271-290, May.
    8. de Brauw, Alan & Hoddinott, John, 2011. "Must conditional cash transfer programs be conditioned to be effective? The impact of conditioning transfers on school enrollment in Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 359-370, November.
    9. Pranab Bardhan, 2002. "Decentralization of Governance and Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 185-205, Fall.
    10. Dragan Filipovich & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa & Alma Santillán Hernández, 2018. "Campaign externalities, programmatic spending, and voting preferences in rural Mexico: The case of Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera programme," WIDER Working Paper Series 027, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Jérémie Gignoux, 2006. "Évaluations ex ante et ex post d'un programme d'allocations scolaires conditionnées au Mexique," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(3), pages 59-85.
    12. Carlos Alviar & Roger Pearson, 2009. "Cash Transfers for Vulnerable Children in Kenya: From Political Choice to Scale Up," Working papers 0902, UNICEF,Division of Policy and Strategy.
    13. Schady, Norbert & Rosero, José, 2008. "Are cash transfers made to women spent like other sources of income?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 246-248, December.
    14. Dragan Filipovich & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa & Alma Santillán Hernández, 2018. "Campaign externalities, programmatic spending, and voting preferences in rural Mexico: The case of Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera programme," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-27, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Amanda Glassman & Jessica Todd, 2007. "Performance-Based Incentives for Health: Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean," Working Papers 120, Center for Global Development.
    16. Maluccio, John A. & Flores, Rafael, 2004. "Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social," FCND discussion papers 184, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Seth R. Gitter & James Manley & Bradford L. Barham, 2013. "Early-Childhood Nutrition and Educational Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(10), pages 1397-1411, October.
    18. Coady, David P. & Perez, Raul & Vera-Illamas, Hadid, 2005. "Evaluating the Cost of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: An Illustration Based on PROGRESA in Mexico," FCND Discussion Papers 59284, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. M. Savy & S. Fortin & Y. Kameli & S. Renault & C. Couderc & A. Gamli & K. Amouzou & M. L. Perenze & Y. Martin-Prevel, 2020. "Impact of a food voucher program in alleviating household food insecurity in two cities in Senegal during a food price crisis," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(2), pages 465-478, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.