IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fcnddp/16410.html

Women'S Assets And Intrahousehold Allocation In Rural Bangladesh: Testing Measures Of Bargaining Power

Author

Listed:
  • Quisumbing, Agnes R.
  • de la Briere, Benedicte

Abstract

This paper examines how differences in the bargaining power of husband and wife affect the distribution of consumption expenditures in rural Bangladeshi households. Two alternative measures of assets are used: current assets and the value of assets brought to marriage. Results show that both assets at marriage and current assets are strongly determined by the human capital of husband and wife and the characteristics of their origin families. For both husband and wife, parents’ landholdings are a consistent determinant of both assets at marriage and current assets. Contrary to the unitary model, husband’s and wife’s assets have different effects on the allocation of expenditures within the household. Wife’s assets have a positive and significant effect on the share of expenditures on children’s clothing and education. This result is robust to the choice of asset measure and estimation procedure. After endogeneity of assets is accounted for, husband’s current assets have a positive and significant effect on the food expenditure share. Neglecting the endogeneity of asset measures to individual and parental characteristics may lead to biased estimates of the impact of men’s and women’s assets on expenditure shares.

Suggested Citation

  • Quisumbing, Agnes R. & de la Briere, Benedicte, 2000. "Women'S Assets And Intrahousehold Allocation In Rural Bangladesh: Testing Measures Of Bargaining Power," FCND Discussion Papers 16410, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16410
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16410/files/fc000086.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.