IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/faoets/309368.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of alternative routes of public investment in agriculture and their impact on economic growth and rural poverty reduction in Nicaragua

Author

Listed:
  • Sánchez, Marco V.
  • Cicowiez, Martin
  • Ramírez, Janet

Abstract

In the face of the economic downturn that Nicaragua experienced in 2018 and the need for a recovery, the study provides a comparative analysis of how investments in productive infrastructure in different agri-food sectors would impact on growth and poverty. The analysis is based on scenarios generated through an economy-wide model representing the Nicaraguan economy and its sectors. The model includes financing constraints and the study explores different financing options for the new investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sánchez, Marco V. & Cicowiez, Martin & Ramírez, Janet, 2020. "Analysis of alternative routes of public investment in agriculture and their impact on economic growth and rural poverty reduction in Nicaragua," FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study 309368, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:faoets:309368
    DOI: 10.4060/cb1149en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309368/files/Analysis%20of%20alternative%20routes%20of%20public%20investment%20in%20agriculture%20and%20their%20impact%20on%20economic%20growth%20and%20rural%20poverty%20reduction%20in%20Nicaragua.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4060/cb1149en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Food Security and Poverty; Public Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:faoets:309368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faoooit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.