IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ersrdr/334638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health Status and Use of Health Care Services by the Older Population: A Residential Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Rogers, Carolyn C.

Abstract

Although the majority of elderly persons are, and perceive themselves to be, in good health, health status differs by residential location, with a higher proportion of nonmetro elders reporting their health as fair or poor (35 percent) than metro elders (29 percent). The nonmetro elderly are also more likely to have certain chronic conditions, such as arthritis, that are clearly associated with poorer physical functioning. Differences in elders’ self-assessments of health and physical functioning remain evident when other factors, such as age, race, social support networks, income, and education are accounted for. The nonmetro elderly use less health care (compared with metro residents) than is commensurate with their health status. This suggests that there is a gap between the nonmetro elderly's need for care, based on their poorer health status and lower socioeconomic standing, and the availability of services to meet this need. This report uses data from the 1984 Supplement on Aging to the National Health Interview Survey to describe the nature and magnitude of differences in health status and use of health care services by the older population, by place of residence.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ersrdr:334638
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.334638
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334638/files/RDRR86.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.334638?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersrdr:334638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.