IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eerhrr/95068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tradable Green Certificates as a Policy Instrument? A Discussion on the Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Heinzel, Christoph
  • Winkler, Thomas

Abstract

Quota obligation schemes based on tradable green certificates have become a popular policy instrument to expand power generation from renewable energy sources (RES). Their application, however, can neither be justified as a first-best response to a market failure, nor, in a second-best sense, as an instrument mitigating distortionary effects of the emissions externality, if an emissions trading system exists that fully covers the energy industry. We study how ancillary reasons, in form of overcoming various barriers for RES use and establishing beneficial side-effects, such as industry development, energy security, and abatement of pollutants not covered under the ETS, apply to the scheme recently introduced in Poland. While setting substantial expansion incentives, an advantage for local industry or job-market development or energy security can hardly be seen. With rising power prices for end consumers and awareness that the extra rents from the schemes mostly accrue to foreign investors and renewable and polluting generators, we expect a negative impact on social acceptance for RES and RES deployment support policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinzel, Christoph & Winkler, Thomas, 2010. "Tradable Green Certificates as a Policy Instrument? A Discussion on the Case of Poland," Research Reports 95068, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eerhrr:95068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/95068/files/Tradable%20Green%20Certificates%20as%20a%20Policy%20Instrument%20A%20Discussion%20on%20the%20Case%20of%20Poland.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eerhrr:95068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.