IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae67/241263.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Typical food products and sensory assessment: designing and implementing typicality trials

Author

Listed:
  • Casabianca, François
  • De Sainte Marie, Christine

Abstract

"Typical products"» are foodstuffs belonging to a group of products which claim an organic link to a given territory, a particular history and a local community. Legal recognition and protection of their geographical origin require that the typical products comply with the new European regulations. Under these regulations, local producers must justify this link by defining their products and working out trial and control procedures. In this process, sensory assessment is a driving factor in constructing the product's typicality. It engages specific human resources such as the assessors'senses in a procedure that is neither hedonistic (acceptability for the consumer), nor able to delegated to outside experts (conformity with a standard). What the assessors must decide is whether a candidate product can be included in a given type by assessing its faithfulness to the type's memory. With this objective in mind, how is the typicality trial to be designed ? We show that the setting for the trial is necessarily of a composite nature. The criteria to be used as well as the consideration of their different modalities mobilise several forms of knowledge that are distributed throughout the local community (producers, connoisseurs and product mediators). Jn these settings the memory linked to the product is activated and transmitted. The decision to include or not a product in the type to which it claims to belong incorporates the innate variety of a typical product, i.e. "cru" types, seasons or years, as admissible concrete expression of the type. Judging the typicality of a product thus becomes a deliberation process among the different parties in the setting in order to reach a consensual decision. The fact of engaging these specific human competencies in the typicality trial is a form of normalisation of the product. The new properties enable the typical products to be recognised as such outside their geographical area of origin, without however despoiling them of their originality.

Suggested Citation

  • Casabianca, François & De Sainte Marie, Christine, 1999. "Typical food products and sensory assessment: designing and implementing typicality trials," 67th Seminar, October 28-30, 1999, LeMans, France 241263, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae67:241263
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.241263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/241263/files/Casabianca%20and%20Sainte%20Marie%20_1999_%20Typical%20food%20products%20and%20sensory%20assessment_%20designing%20and%20implementing%20typicality%20trials.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.241263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae67:241263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.