IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae11/114345.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cap Under Fire: The Budgetary Review And The Cap

Author

Listed:
  • Elekes, Andrea
  • Halmai, Peter

Abstract

During the process of the budgetary review the CAP faces its greatest challenge of its history: not only the (common) financing of the CAP, but the future of the CAP itself is at stake. It is obvious that the reform steps implemented so far – even though they have several forward-looking elements – do not result in a CAP sustainable on the long run. Further changes are inevitable. Basing our analysis on the theories of fiscal federalism and other political economy approaches, we try to answer the following questions. Is common financing of a reformed CAP justified? Can national co-financing be extended? Is it justified to keep the system of commonly financed direct payments?

Suggested Citation

  • Elekes, Andrea & Halmai, Peter, 2011. "Cap Under Fire: The Budgetary Review And The Cap," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114345, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae11:114345
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.114345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/114345/files/Elekes_Andrea_699.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.114345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae11:114345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.