IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa140/163346.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pyramidal Management of Risk Control- Case Study in Agro-food Enterprises in Iasi County, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Iatco, Constantin
  • Ignat, Gabriela

Abstract

In agro-food enterprises from Romania, management of risk control is seen as a dynamic process that, in order to work involves a cycle that incorporates risk identification, assessment, administering and verification. Risk management is closely related to the performance management, so that it has been set establishing key indicators of the performance. The pyramid of risk management provides to the managers a model of effective approach of risk and the ability to manage them, thus increasing consolidation capacity of added value. Risk management is necessary because all agro-food enterprises face uncertainty and the management team must determine the acceptable level of risk The paper presents a case study on the pyramidal management of risk control for two major agro-food enterprises from Iasi County. The authors have established as main goals in this paper identifying the objectives of the audit, assessment and measuring risk according to the probability of impact occurrence and the period of events consequences, prioritizing risks, risks analyzing and reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Iatco, Constantin & Ignat, Gabriela, 2014. "Pyramidal Management of Risk Control- Case Study in Agro-food Enterprises in Iasi County, Romania," 140th Seminar, December 13-15, 2013, Perugia, Italy 163346, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa140:163346
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/163346/files/38%20Constantin%20Iatco_%20Gabriela%20Ignat.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.163346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa140:163346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.