IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa122/98987.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the perspectives of a mixed case study approach for the evaluation of the EU Rural Development Policy 2007-2013

Author

Listed:
  • Terluin, Ida J.
  • Berkhout, Petra

Abstract

For the evaluation of the EU Rural Development Policy in the programming period 2007-2013, the European Commission has designed a Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF). Given a widespread lack of enthusiasm and the complexity of the CMEF, in this paper a comparative analysis of 22 evaluation methods of rural development policy is conducted in order to explore whether an alternative approach for the evaluation of the EU Rural Development Policy exists. The mixed case study approach is identified as potential alternative. This approach combines the analysis of data on input and output with in-depth interviews. First results of testing this method in the mid-term evaluation of the EU Rural Development Policy 2007-2009 in the Dutch NUTS2 region of Zeeland indicate that this approach might be a promising alternative to the CMEF. It is easier to implement and renders useful insight into the question why measures have been effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Terluin, Ida J. & Berkhout, Petra, 2011. "Exploring the perspectives of a mixed case study approach for the evaluation of the EU Rural Development Policy 2007-2013," 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy 98987, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa122:98987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/98987
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Evaluation methods; EU Rural Development Policy; mixed case-study approach; Agricultural and Food Policy; R500; R580;

    JEL classification:

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa122:98987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.