IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa118/94907.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the impact of different rural development policy design options on the adoption of innovation across five case studies in EU

Author

Listed:
  • Bartolini, Fabio
  • Floridi, Matteo
  • Latruffe, Laure
  • Majewski, Edward
  • Nikolov, Dimitre
  • Polman, Nico B.P.
  • Viaggi, Davide

Abstract

Innovation and new technology adoption represent two central elements for the enterprise and industry development process in agriculture. The objective of the paper is to provide an ex-ante analysis of the effectiveness of alternative policy design options concerning the RDP measures intended to provide incentives for investment/innovation adoption in five case study areas across Europe. The model implemented is based on a real option approach that includes investment irreversibility and stochasticity in SFP. The results show the relevance of uncertainty in determining the timing of adoption and emphasise the importance of predictability as a major component of policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartolini, Fabio & Floridi, Matteo & Latruffe, Laure & Majewski, Edward & Nikolov, Dimitre & Polman, Nico B.P. & Viaggi, Davide, 2010. "Assessing the impact of different rural development policy design options on the adoption of innovation across five case studies in EU," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94907, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94907
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94907/files/Bartolini-Assessing_the_impact_of_different_rural_development_policy_design_options_on_the_adoption_of_innovation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.94907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter R. Tozer & Jeffrey R. Stokes, 2009. "Investing in Perennial Pasture Improvement: A Real Options Analysis," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 88-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert C. Anderson & Alfons Weersink, 2014. "A Real Options Approach for the Investment Decisions of a Farm-Based Anaerobic Digester," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(1), pages 69-87, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.