IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa118/94616.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rural development policy delivery and governance in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Papadopoulou, Eleni
  • Christos, Papalexiou
  • Hasanagas, Nikolaos
  • Ventouri, Eirini

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is focused on understanding the politico-administrative system and structure of rural policy implementation in the third programming period (2000-2006). Case studies have been conducted for selected measures of the Greek Rural Development Programme (RDP) and LEADER+ initiative. In-depth interviews were conducted with officials involved in the rural development policy implementation. Inflexibility due to centralization, lack of personnel motivation and inadequacy of the personnel involved in policy implementation are the main weaknesses. Work seasonal overload is also a weakness, which can be caused by peak periods or by too many and in part possibly unnecessary documents, official permissions and other legal or administrative obligations. The administrative personnel should be better motivated by financial bonus and properly trained. A central integrated database, accessible to all administrative levels and units, should also be designed. Such changes could lead to a smoother decentralisation process because in some cases centralisation is considered to cause communication obstacles, work overload and delays.

Suggested Citation

  • Papadopoulou, Eleni & Christos, Papalexiou & Hasanagas, Nikolaos & Ventouri, Eirini, 2010. "Rural development policy delivery and governance in Greece," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94616, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/94616
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rural Development Programme; policy implementation; governance; administration; Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:94616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.