IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cmpart/243446.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Household Decision Making Associated with Shift from Pastoral to Agro-Pastoral Farming Systems in Transmara West District - Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Machana, Magembe

Abstract

The shift from pastoral to agro-pastoral farming system is on-going among the Maasai community in Trans-Mara West district of Kenya. This community has had a long time history in pastoral livelihoods, but are increasingly engaged in the shift, in spite of the Kenyan Government effort to set up co-operative societies for marketing livestock and livestock related products. Essentially, these co-operatives are supposed to trigger extensive expansion in livestock production which in turn could have implication on natural resource conservation. Despite this effort, pastoralists in the area are not sufficiently responsive as evidenced by the ongoing gradual shift. The push and pull factors between the pastoral and agro-pastoral livelihoods necessitates clarity. The shift in livelihoods could be following a rational and economic decision with impacts on the diversity of livestock and crops but empirical evidence is lacking to ascertain this assumption. Evaluating household decision making associated with the shift, may explain the rationale of observed behavior and inform development strategies for such areas. Specific objectives of the study were to compare differences between pastoral and agro-pastoral based livelihoods for: - socio-economic characteristics of practicing households, diversity in crops and livestock enterprises, economic benefits of the farming systems and to determine the factors associated with the shift. Stratified proportionate random sampling procedure was used to get the appropriate sample. Data were collected from a sample of 130 households through interview schedule. Data was subjected to chi square and t-test statistics while diversity of crops and livestock was based on Shannon index. An economic evaluation model was used to compare economic benefits while Heckman two-step model was used to determine the factors associated with the shift to agro-pastoral farming. The findings indicated that agro-pastoral households were older farmers with declining farm size, stronger in social capital and more inclined to diversification of livelihoods. They had better access to credit facilities and extension services. Shannon index of diversity for crops was 0.3 units higher in agro-pastoral farming where unit net economic benefits were 0.02 times greater. The shift from pastoral to agro-pastoral livelihoods was enhanced by more frequent group meetings and farmer trainings, declining land sizes, longer distance to watering points, shorter distance to market and more income from off-farm sources of incomes. The agro-pastorals choice to allocate higher proportion of land for crop production compared to livestock production was enhanced by more distance to watering points, low off-farm incomes, private land ownership, larger family, male dominance, more extension services, shorter distance to the market, less years of crop farming and little interaction with the neighbors.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Machana, Magembe, 2013. "Evaluation of Household Decision Making Associated with Shift from Pastoral to Agro-Pastoral Farming Systems in Transmara West District - Kenya," Research Theses 243446, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:243446
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.243446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/243446/files/Esther%20Magembe%20Thesis%202011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.243446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:243446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agriculturaleconomics.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.