IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cmpart/198528.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost Benefit Analysis of Climate Change Adaption Strategies on Crop Production Systems: A Case of Mpolonjeni Area Development Programme (ADP) in Swaziland

Author

Listed:
  • Shongwe, Phindile

Abstract

The study is a descriptive survey done at Mpolonjeni ADP which is a representative sample for the project as it is affected by climate change and variability. This is evident as there is high level of food insecurity, crop failure, poverty and hunger Mpolonjeni ADP. The increased involvement of food relief agencies nearly on an annual basis is a clear indication that agricultural production, the mainstay of the areas has drastically fallen, and households’ livelihoods are at risk. The objectives of the study were to identify the impact of climate change on crop production, identify private adaptation strategies, conduct a cost benefit analysis for the adaptation strategies identified and identify socioeconomic factors influencing the choice of households when adapting to climate change. Sample was randomly selected and personal interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Ricardian regression model, cost benefit analysis and multinomial logistic model. The results indicated that temperatures are increasing and rainfall is decreasing and this reduces maize yields. Adaptation strategies used are; drought resistant varieties, switching crops, irrigation, crop rotation, mulching, minimum tillage, early planting, late planting and intercropping. Switching crops has the highest NPV, where maize (E14.40) should be substituted with drought tolerant crops such as cotton (E1864.40), sorghum (E283.30) and dry beans (292.20). Factors influencing the choice of adaptation were; age of household head, occupation of household head, belonging to a social group , land category , access to credit, access to extension services training, high incidences of crop pest and disease, high input prices, high food prices, perceptions of households towards climate change. From the results, it is recommended that households should grow drought tolerant crops such as cotton, sorghum and dry beans instead of maize. The government should provide irrigation system, strengthen extension services and subsidise inputs. Further studies should analyse by CEA and MCA.

Suggested Citation

  • Shongwe, Phindile, 2013. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Climate Change Adaption Strategies on Crop Production Systems: A Case of Mpolonjeni Area Development Programme (ADP) in Swaziland," Research Theses 198528, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:198528
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.198528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/198528/files/Thesis%20June%202013_Phindile%20Shongwe_%20UNISWA3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.198528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niranjan Devkota & Ram Kumar Phuyal & Durga Lal Shrestha, 2017. "Cost and benefit analysis of adoption of climate change adaptation options among rural rice farmers in Nepal," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(7), pages 136-148, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:198528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agriculturaleconomics.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.