IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs94/258740.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Studies To Improve Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe) Productivity And Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Hosein, Azim

Abstract

Poor quality and low productivity of ginger rhizomes made the product uncompetitive on the extra-regional market. This study tested the components that could produce rhizomes of similar quality to the Hawaiian grade. Three field experiments were carried out to evaluate fertilizer formulations, fertilizer rates with organic manures and system of cultivation, and system of cultivation and plant density. Organic manure increased overall yield by 25% and exportable grade ginger by 500%. Closer intra-row spacing produced higher yields in both systems of cultivation. Furrow cultivation maximized total rhizome yield and exportable grade ginger with a 50% reduction in fertilizer requirement of 500 kg. ha '). Furrow cultivation improved the exportable grade yield of ginger but not overall yield. The addition of phosphate to the 15-08-24 NPK did not improve yields. A combined technology of 25 cm intra row spacing, organic manure, furrow cultivation and NPK fertilizer (15-08-24) at 500 kg. ha'1 was compared to the existing technology on 2000 m2 plots. Exportable grade ginger increased by 300%, and cost of production fell from EC $1.31 kg to EC $0.57kg"' (US $1.00 = EC $2.70).

Suggested Citation

  • Hosein, Azim, 1994. "Studies To Improve Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe) Productivity And Quality," 30th Annual Meeting, July 31-August 5, 1994, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands 258740, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs94:258740
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258740/files/30_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs94:258740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.