IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs93/258875.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of physical barriers on sweet potato weevil control

Author

Listed:
  • Crossman, S.M.A.
  • Collingwood, C.D.
  • Palada, M.C.

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine the effect of physical barriers (black plastic, weed barrier and grass mulch) and a bare soil treatment on sweet potato weevil (SPW) infestation of "Viola" and "Sunny" sweet potato cultivars. Harvested roots were individually inspected and rated on a SPW damage index (DI) of 1-6 ( I - no damage, 6 - most severe damage). A mean damage index (MDI) was also calculated. All medium-sized storage roots with a DI rating _ 2 were considered as marketable yield. The yield of medium-sized roots for the "Sunny" cultivar was significantly higher under plastic mulch than on bare soil. The grass mulch treatment produced a higher percentage of storage roots rated DI-1 than plots with synthetic mulches (plastic or weed barrier). The grass mulch treatment also produced a higher percentage of medium-sized marketable roots than the weed barrier treatment. Sweet potatoes from the weed barrier plots had a higher MDI than those in the grass mulch plots. In the "Viola" study, the grass mulch treatment produced the highest total and marketable yields. The weed barrier treatment had a higher MDI, a lower percentage of roots rated DI-1 and a higher percentage of roots rated DI-6 than all the other treatments. These trials have demonstrated that grass mulch has more potential than weed barrier for controlling SPW.

Suggested Citation

  • Crossman, S.M.A. & Collingwood, C.D. & Palada, M.C., 1993. "Effect of physical barriers on sweet potato weevil control," 29th Annual Meeting, 1993, Martinique 258875, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs93:258875
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258875/files/29_28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs93:258875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.