IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs92/259041.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Control of Casha (Acacia spp) on Native Pasture

Author

Listed:
  • Adjei, M.B.

Abstract

Native pastures, dominated by guineagrass (Panicum maximums and leucaena tLeucaena leucocephalai, provide the basic feed resource for the ruminant livestock industry in the Virgin Islands. However, many of these pastures are in advanced stages ofdeterioration because of overgrazing. There are currently no standard recommendations to prevent the continued ingress of malevolent plants such as ca~ha (Acacia spp.). A split plot field trial was set up to test the efficacy of mechanical and/or chemical treatments for the control of casha. Main plots, replicated three times, consisted of mechanical shredding vs. non-shredded mature plants. These treatments were applied in May, 1990. Subplots were 6 chemical foliar sprays: 2.0 and 3.0 kglha of dicamba alone; 1.28 and 2.56 kg/ha ofTrimecR Super Brush Killer (1:4:4 dicamba, 2,4-0 and 2,4-DP); 285 Llha of diesel oil; and a herbicide check. Subplot treatments were applied 12 wk after mechanical treatments to allow for sufficient regrowth on shredded plots. Chemical application was repeated 24 wk after the first application. Plant density of casha and frequency of canopy occurrence of all dominant plant species were taken initially in May, 1990, and again after 36 wk (just before second herbicide application) and 84 wk. Shreddin-e .i.lene prevented the 14% increase (P<0.05) in the initial ~ casha plant density (1.3 plants/m" ) that was observed on the nonshredded herbicide check, but did not kill any existing casha plant over the 84-wk period. However, shredding plus regrowth combined with dicarnba or Trimel,;R application synergistically induced greater (P <0.0 I) casha mortality (68 '7c) than similar herbicide-treated mature non-shredded plots (48% mortality). A significant leaf drop and canopy reduction (62 7~) followed the first application of diesel oil on shredded plus regrowth treatment but there was no long term topkill (4%) of existing cash a plants. The higher rates of both herbicides provided the best control of casha. Approximately 80% casha mortality was obtained by the initial application of 3.0 kg/ha of dicamba or by double application of 2.56 kg/ha of TrimecR to the shredded plus regrowth treatment without any deleterious effect on the associated leucaena or guineagrass. These data signify that mechanical shredding could be integrated with available herbicides for satisfactory control of casha on native pasture.

Suggested Citation

  • Adjei, M.B., 1992. "The Control of Casha (Acacia spp) on Native Pasture," 28th Annual Meeting, August 9-15, 1992, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic 259041, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs92:259041
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.259041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/259041/files/28-374.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.259041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs92:259041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.