IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs91/259203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sillage Production From Grass-Legume Systems In The Caribbean

Author

Listed:
  • Adjei, M.B.

Abstract

Livestock production in the Caribbean Basin ls largely based on grazing native pastures. However, alternate wet and dry seasons lead to an abundance of feed during the rainy season and acute feed shortages during the dry season. Forage from grass-legume systems that is produced in the rainy season and stored as silage provides an option for overcoming the dry season feed constraint to livestock performance. The yield, quality, disease resistance, and silage pH of forage from monocultures of three sorghum varieties and a mlllet-elephantgrass hybrid were compared with those from alley-cropping systems with native legumes (Leucaena leucocephala and Desmanthus virgatus), Total (grass+ legume) dry forage yield from two harvests was not affected by cropping system in the initial year. The highest yield for sorghum was obtained from Puerto Rico SBR forage sorghum (PRSBR) (6.4 tons per acre (T/A) compared with 5.6 T/A each from Dekalb forage sorghum (FS25A) and Haygrazer sudangrass. About 7 T/A total dry forage of the millet-elephantgrass (M-E) hybrid was produced in monoculture and 5.5 T/A in mixed cultures (P< 0.05). It also provided two additional harvests of 1.5 T/A each during the dry season, Legumes contributed approximately 10% of the total dry forage in1 the mixed-cropping systems. Crude protein (CP) concentration (8.18%) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOHD) (60%) of forage was similar for all grasses and was not affec- ted by cropping system. Despite its shrubby morphology, forage quality of Leucaena (2l. 7% CP and 60% IVOHD) was1 consistently superior (P< 0.01) to that of Desmanthus (14.2% CP and 45% IVOHD), The head/stover ratio was highest for PR5BR (40:60) and least for H-E hybrid (13:87). Dekalb FS25A was the most susceptible, and PR5BR 11nd M-E hybrid the least susceptible, to sorghum rust and target spot. The pH of forage samples ensiled with (3%) and without molasses addition for 90 days were 4.7 and 4,0, respectively (P< 0,05). The preliminary data indicate a potential for selecting from available grasses to provide compatible grass/legume mixtures for silage. The ensilage procedure used can be modified to suit the small-scale farmer.

Suggested Citation

  • Adjei, M.B., 1991. "Sillage Production From Grass-Legume Systems In The Caribbean," 27th Annual Meeting, July 14-20, 1991, Roseau, Dominica 259203, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs91:259203
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.259203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/259203/files/27_24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.259203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paterson, R.T., 1990. "FORAGE PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION OF Leucaena leucocephala IN THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING CARIBBEAN," 26th Annual Meeting, July 29 to August 4, 1990, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 259406, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs91:259203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.