IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs90/259387.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

COMPARISON OF POWDERY MILDEW (Erysiphe cichoracearum) INOCULATION METHODS IN Cucurbita moschata

Author

Listed:
  • Cienfuegos, R.
  • Wessel-Beaver, L.
  • Varela, F.

Abstract

Powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum) limits pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) production in Puerto Rico and other areas of the Caribbean. In order to effectively use half-sib family recurrent selection to develop polygenic mildew resistance we tested various inoculation methods to determine which method can best be used to quantify small differences in resistance. Dusting leaves using infected plant tissue was a fast and effective method that would be useful in a screening program where many genotypes need t4o be evaluated but where resistance need not be quantified. Spraying with a 1 x 10 spores/cc triton suspension was an efficient method for a recurrent selection program where small differences in resistance among families must be determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Cienfuegos, R. & Wessel-Beaver, L. & Varela, F., 1990. "COMPARISON OF POWDERY MILDEW (Erysiphe cichoracearum) INOCULATION METHODS IN Cucurbita moschata," 26th Annual Meeting, July 29 to August 4, 1990, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 259387, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs90:259387
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.259387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/259387/files/26_58.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.259387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs90:259387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.