IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs83/261651.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Suitability Of Communal Rearing For Performance Testing Of Tilapias

Author

Listed:
  • McGinty, Andrew S.

Abstract

Triplicate plastic pools were stocked separately with either Tilapia aurea, T. hornorum, T. nilotica, or Taiwanese red tilapia fingerlings (60 fish/pool) averaging 7.3, 5.7, 8.2, or 7.6 g, respectively. Three other plastic pools were stocked communally (mixed groups) with equal numbers of similarly sized fish of the above four groups. Fish were fed 32% protein sinking pellets at an initial rate of 5% and decreasing to 3.5% total body weight daily divided into two equal feedings. All the fish were harvested after 88 days. Gains in weight and total length for separately stocked pools were 62.8 g (78.8 mm), 59.8 g (79.0 mm),69.8 g (80.7 mm), and 73.5 g (86.0 mm); and for communally stocked pools were 64.6 g (77.2 mm), 61.5 g (79.5 mm), 70.6 g (81.7 mm), and 91.0 g (89.4 mm) for T. aurea, T. hornorum, T. nilotica, and Taiwanese red tilapia, respectively. Males gained more than females for all groups in separate and communal cultures, however, a significant group by sex interaction existed. In separately stocked pools, males gained 23, 119, 76 and 43% more in weight, and 12, 59, 35 and 21% more in length than females for T. aurea, T. hornorum, T. nilotica, and Taiwanese red tilapia, respectively. Rankings of gains were the same for separately and communally stocked pools indicating that communal rearing is an efficient means of performance testing tilapias.

Suggested Citation

  • McGinty, Andrew S., 1983. "Suitability Of Communal Rearing For Performance Testing Of Tilapias," 19th Annual Meeting, September 11-17, 1983, Puerto Rico 261651, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs83:261651
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.261651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261651/files/19-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261651/files/19-22.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.261651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs83:261651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.