Author
Abstract
Agriculture produces between 12 and 14% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, excluding transport and processing. While there are options to reduce GHG emissions from agricultural production, food security could also be considered the most legitimate form of GHG emission. The main GHG emissions from agriculture are methane, associated with rice and livestock production, and nitrous oxide associated with nitrogen inputs. Agricultural land can also sequester carbon in soils and trees and, while this is an important contribution, it is perhaps only reversing the land use change disturbance created for agriculture in the first place. A recent assessment by the Net Zero Australia plan concluded that current reliance by the large industrial emitters on the land sector to provide their offsets are questionable, as agriculture on its own will struggle to meet its stated value chain targets, including insetting all available sequestration. Reducing livestock numbers has often been touted as an overly simplistic solution to reducing agricultural GHG emissions, forgetting that most livestock exist in lower socioeconomic regions and are integral to their food security and livelihoods.Taking a more multi-functional perspective of livestock in subsistence agricultural systems shows that the GHG emissions attributable to meat or milk can be much lower than those of industrial farming systems. Livestock are integral to a largely vegetarian diet in subsistence agricultural systems, without which industrial fertilisers and diesel would be required to produce crops. The production and use of industrial fertilisers contributes approximately 5% of global GHG, but almost half of the world’s population is dependent on industrial nitrogen for their food security. Options are emerging to reduce enteric methane by more than 80% and estimates show that improving nitrogen use efficiency can reduce nitrous oxide emissions by over 50%. However, few of these options are profitable, and even less are relevant to extensive or subsistence agricultural systems. While some agricultural systems can achieve net zero GHG emissions, there are inevitable GHG emissions associated with agricultural production. However, the land use sector also manages significant natural resources and perhaps the future lies in striking a balance between biodiversity and mitigation in a more integrated approach.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:cfcp25:391423
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.391423
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp25:391423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crawfordfund.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.