IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcp15/245050.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

No More Business as Usual for Food Security and Nutrition: Our Shared Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Verburg, H.E. Gerda

Abstract

To produce 70% more food by 2050 to feed the expected 9 billion people, it can’t be business as usual. We simply don’t have the energy or water to sustain such an increase. A world without hunger is within our reach if we are smarter in the way that we use the resources, tools, and technology available to us, and if we are willing to move away from working in silos and embrace a crosscutting and multi-stakeholder approach. There is growing global attention/recognition on the need to transform agriculture and food systems. The way to do this means that each and every stakeholder must play their role and at the same time open up to collaboration with other stakeholders – from big companies, to family farmers, advocacy organisations, research institutions etc. The Committee on World Food Security (CFS) and the World Economic Forum’s New Vision for Agriculture are leading the charge on this transformation by bringing together governments, private sector actors, civil society representatives, leading research organisations, financing institutions and many others in order to contribute to the birth of a diversity of solutions to feed the 1 billion people still living in extreme poverty and the 2 billion suffering from malnutrition. Now more than ever, as we are set to agree on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), exploring how we can intensify our existing collaboration and expand the opportunities to build on each other’s strengths is necessary if we are to be successful at bridging the projected annual investment deficit of $2.5 trillion. Addressing food security and nutrition has at times been a minefield of polarising debates, when in fact the best solutions are often found when we can combine and build on ideas and options from across the spectrum. Not shying away from addressing contentious issues in a multi stakeholder dialogue – like the role of genetic engineering, or the role for smallholders in intensification, how to optimize land use, or how we can combine traditional knowledge with innovation and technology – is the only way to build consensus and truly create food systems, where sustainability and profitability are inextricably linked.

Suggested Citation

  • Verburg, H.E. Gerda, 2015. "No More Business as Usual for Food Security and Nutrition: Our Shared Responsibility," 2015: The Business of Food Security: Profitability, Sustainability and Risk, 10-12 August 2015 245050, Crawford Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:245050
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.245050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/245050/files/Pages%20from%20Conf2015-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.245050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Food Security and Poverty;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:245050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crawfordfund.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.