IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cesthe/311317.html

Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) to lime and customized micronutrient fertilizer in Nandi County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Shadrack, Kipngetich Chumo

Abstract

Low soil fertility associated with nutrient mining of both macro and micronutrients and soil acidity is a major constraint affecting crop production in Western Kenya. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the effect of customized fertilizer and lime on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth and yield and (ii) to determine the effect of selected micronutrient (boron, zinc and molybdenum) with lime on their uptake and growth of common bean. In the first experiment, a field experiment was conducted on 2 sites of Kapkerer and Kiptaruswo, Nandi County. A 4 × 2 factorial experiment was set up in randomized complete block design. The treatments were Mavuno fertilizer (15:10:18: plus sulphur, calcium, magnesium, iron copper, boron and molybdenum) (0, 185 kg ha-1), Sympal fertilizer (0:23:15 calcium, magnesium, sulphur and zinc) (0, 125 kg ha-1), Diammonium phosphate fertilizer (positive control) (0, 62.5 kg ha-1) and lime (0, and 1.6 or 2.0 t ha-1 depending on specific lime requirement for the site). Yield, phosphorous uptake, below and aboveground biomass were determined. In the second experiment, a greenhouse experiment was conducted at Egerton University using soil from Kapkerer site. A 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment was set up in completely randomized design. The treatments were, boron (0, 3 kg ha-1), zinc (0, 1.5 kg ha-1) Mo (0, 0.6 kg ha-1) and lime (0, 1.6 t ha-1). Plant tissue analysis for micronutrient uptake (boron, zinc and molybdenum) above and below-ground biomass were determined. The results showed that application of lime increased above and belowground biomass, nutrient uptake and yield in common bean while combined application of Mavuno fertilizer with lime further enhanced common bean growth and increased yields by 42%, 30% and 27%, respectively, compared to control, Sympal and DAP. Application of DAP and Sympal in combination with lime did not have a significant effect on common bean yield. On the other hand, the application of boron with molybdenum significantly increased above and below-ground biomass by 24% and 32%, respectively, compared with the control. The application of boron and lime significantly increased aboveground biomass by 11%, while molybdenum with lime application significantly increased belowground biomass by 29%. The results for this study suggest that the use of Mavuno fertilizer formulation can significantly improve common bean productivity in Western Kenya smallholder systems, and inclusion of boron and molybdenum in the fertilizer and liming the soil is necessary for enhanced common bean productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Shadrack, Kipngetich Chumo, 2020. "Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) to lime and customized micronutrient fertilizer in Nandi County, Kenya," Centre of Excellence in Sustainable Agriculture and Agribusiness Management (CESAAM) - Theses and Dissertations 311317, Egerton University, Centre of Excellence in Sustainable Agriculture and Agribusiness Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:cesthe:311317
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311317/files/Kipngetich%20Chumo%20Shadrack%20Thesis_2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Liu & Y.S. Yang & G.D. XU & Y.H. Fang & Y.A. Yang & R.M. Kalin, 2005. "The effect of molybdenum and boron in soil on the growth and photosynthesis of three soybean varieties," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(5), pages 197-205.
    2. R. Lal, 2009. "Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 45-57, February.
    3. M. Kumar & A. L. Babel, 2011. "Available Micronutrient Status and Their Relationship with Soil Properties of Jhunjhunu Tehsil, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(2), pages 1-97, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaleta, Moti & Kassie, Menale & Erenstein, Olaf, 2015. "Determinants of maize stover utilization as feed, fuel and soil amendment in mixed crop-livestock systems, Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 17-23.
    2. Zhihai Yang & Amin W. Mugera & Ning Yin & Yumeng Wang, 2018. "Soil conservation practices and production efficiency of smallholder farms in Central China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1517-1533, August.
    3. Liebenow, Danielle King & Cohen, Matthew J. & Gumbricht, Thomas & Shepherd, Keith D. & Shepherd, Gemma, 2012. "Do ecosystem services influence household wealth in rural Mali?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 33-44.
    4. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Kumar, Ranjit & Kumar, Sanjiv & Yashavanth, B.S. & Meena, P.C., 2019. "Natural Farming Practices in India: Its Adoption and Impact on Crop Yield and Farmers’ Income," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74(03), July.
    6. Nurakhmet Nugymanov & Baglan Muratbek & Xianhui Geng, 2024. "Influence of Biophysical Factors on the Adoption of Soil Conserving Practices among Wheat Farmers in Kazakhstan," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 1983-1995, August.
    7. Renaud Massoukou Pamba & Vincent Poirier & Pamphile Nguema Ndoutoumou & Terence Epule Epule, 2023. "How Can Plants Help Restore Degraded Tropical Soils?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Daniel H. Pope & Johan O. Karlsson & Phillip Baker & David McCoy, 2021. "Examining the Environmental Impacts of the Dairy and Baby Food Industries: Are First-Food Systems a Crucial Missing Part of the Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems Agenda Now Underway?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Bino Paul & Unmesh Patnaik & Subash Sasidharan & Kamal Kumar Murari & Chandra Sekhar Bahinipati, 2022. "Fertilizer Use, Value, and Knowledge Capital: A Case of Indian Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    10. P. Škarpa & E. Kunzová & H. Zukalová, 2013. "Foliar fertilization with molybdenum in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(4), pages 156-161.
    11. Somasundaram Jayaraman & Yash P. Dang & Anandkumar Naorem & Kathryn L. Page & Ram C. Dalal, 2021. "Conservation Agriculture as a System to Enhance Ecosystem Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Donatella Valente & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Angela Maria Scardia Scardia & Maria Victoria Marinelli & Irene Petrosillo, 2023. "Towards Land Consumption Neutrality and Natural Capital Enhancement at Urban Landscape Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Halberg, Niels & Panneerselvam, P. & Treyer, Sebastien, 2015. "Eco-functional Intensification and Food Security: Synergy or Compromise?," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(3 Special).
    14. Ivan Dugan & Paulo Pereira & Jasmina Defterdarovic & Lana Filipovic & Vilim Filipovic & Igor Bogunovic, 2023. "Straw Mulch Application Enhanced Soil Properties and Reduced Diffuse Pollution at a Steep Vineyard in Istria (Croatia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Rattan Lal, 2014. "Climate Strategic Soil Management," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, February.
    16. Idowu Ezekiel Olorunfemi & Ayorinde Akinlabi Olufayo & Johnson Toyin Fasinmirin & Akinola Adesuji Komolafe, 2022. "Dynamics of land use land cover and its impact on carbon stocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: an overview," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 40-76, January.
    17. B. Suresh Reddy, 2015. "Soil Health: Issues and Concerns - A Review," Working Papers id:7599, eSocialSciences.
    18. Ángeles Gallegos & Dante López-Carmona & Francisco Bautista, 2019. "Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Soil Functions in Volcanic Zones from Mexico Using S&E Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Mostafa A. Abdellatif & Ahmed A. El Baroudy & Muhammad Arshad & Esawy K. Mahmoud & Ahmed M. Saleh & Farahat S. Moghanm & Kamal H. Shaltout & Ebrahem M. Eid & Mohamed S. Shokr, 2021. "A GIS-Based Approach for the Quantitative Assessment of Soil Quality and Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Muhammad Naveed & Muhammad Kamran Aslam & Zulfiqar Ahmad & Tasawar Abbas & Asma A. Al-Huqail & Manzer H. Siddiqui & Hayssam M. Ali & Irfan Ashraf & Adnan Mustafa, 2021. "Growth Responses, Physiological Alterations and Alleviation of Salinity Stress in Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) Amended with Gypsum and Composted Cow Dung," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cesthe:311317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cesaam.egerton.ac.ke/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.