Author
Listed:
- Seepersad, Govind
- Rankine, Lloyd B.
- Singh, Ranjit H.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to assess and analyse the implications of liberalization of the European Union (EU) and United States of America (USA) sugar markets on CARICOM producers. Traditionally the EU has been the major market for CARICOM sugar, traded under the EU/ACP Sugar Protocol (SP) and Special Preferential Sugar (SPS) quota arrangement. Additionally, sugar is also sold to the USA through a quota arrangement under the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI). Currently Brazil, Thailand and Australia have requested a WTO panel against the EU, challenging the special arrangements for sugar imports from a number of ACP countries as agreed in the Uruguay Round. This has caused sugar exporting ACP countries to express strong concerns and opposition to this action which runs the risk of undermining this preferential market. But the challenge does not stop there. There are also efforts to change what is considered as "market-distorting sugar regimes" in the United States and Japan through both bilateral and multilateral channels. Much like the case of banana, the outcome of these challenges can pose serious problems for CARICOM economies. This study therefore sought to assess the possible impact of loss of these preferential sugar markets on CARICOM's raw centrifugal sugar industry. In order to do this, an econometric single commodity static market model was constructed and partial equilibrium analysis was used for the impact analysis. Regression models were constructed for the demand and supply equations in order to derive the respective elasticities to be used in the partial equilibrium model. It was found that if the EU and the USA were to discontinue the preferential sugar marketing arrangements and CARICOM producers were required to sell their sugar at the world 'free' market equilibrium price, such a measure will have negative quantity, financial and welfare effects.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:carc04:265611
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.265611
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:carc04:265611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.