IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/carc02/265549.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Competitiveness of Sugar

Author

Listed:
  • Hibbert, Barrington
  • Johnson-Miller, Carol

Abstract

Competitiveness is important for Jamaica's agriculture and specifically sugar, as the instruments of protection are gradually being removed. Sugar producers and sugar interests in Jamaica are concerned that one day they may not benefit from the present preferential agreements for sugar sales to the European community and the United States. A new agreement reached in the year 2000 with the European Union extends Jamaica's preferential treatment to 2008. The study used two indicators namely: "Relative Quasi-tents" and Nominal Rate of Protection" to measure competitiveness. Results of this study suggests that 92% of the farms with 3.3 hectares or less of sugar realized modest quasi-rents that were only about 1.6 times the opportunity cost of owner-operator labour. The comparable figure for producers of 16 hectares of sugarcane was 7.3 times the opportunity cost of owner operator labour. Nominal rates of protection estimated here for the 1990-2000 period indicate that domestic producers have been receiving prices for sugarcane that are about two times the equivalent free market world prices. This is a result of the country's preferential marketing agreement with the European community and the United States. The study points out that Jamaica's sugarcane yields are low, the sugar content of the cane is low, production costs are high and cane ills are currently inefficient.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:carc02:265549
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.265549
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/265549/files/wiae-2002-10.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/265549/files/wiae-2002-10.pdf?subformat=pdfa
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.265549?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:carc02:265549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.