IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/canzdp/263747.html

The Output-Inflation Tradeoff in the United States: Evidence on the New Classical vs. New Keynesian Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Guender, Alfred V.

Abstract

The empirical examination of the output-inflation tradeoff in the United States over a 30 year period reveals that both aggregate uncertainty and average inflation were instrumental in shaping the output-inflation tradeoff. The division of the whole sample period into two distinct sets of subintervals suggests that the New Keynesian view according to which the output-inflation tradeoff is sensitive to changes in average inflation held only unambiguously in the latter part of the respective sample period. The empirical results suggest further that the tradeoff appears to have been sensitive only to changes in aggregate uncertainty in the early part of the sample period, a fact consistent with the New Classical view.

Suggested Citation

  • Guender, Alfred V., "undated". "The Output-Inflation Tradeoff in the United States: Evidence on the New Classical vs. New Keynesian Debate," Department of Economics Discussion Papers 263747, University of Canterbury - New Zealand.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:canzdp:263747
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.263747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/263747/files/canterbury-nz-073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/263747/files/canterbury-nz-073.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.263747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:canzdp:263747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decannz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.