IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/arpcwp/386196.html

Prevented Planting After Buy-Up Elimination: Coverage Level Substitution, Producer Costs, and the Role of Enhanced Premium Subsidies Under the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB)

Author

Listed:
  • Tsiboe, Francis

Abstract

This white paper examines the economic implications of eliminating prevented planting (PP) buy-up coverage under the Federal Crop Insurance Program and evaluates whether producers can offset lost protection through higher base coverage levels. Using administrative evidence on coverage elections and premium structures, the analysis shows that coverage-level substitution provides only a partial and nonlinear replacement for former buy-up protection and becomes infeasible as producers approach the 85 percent coverage ceiling. Most insured acres were already concentrated at high coverage levels prior to elimination, limiting adjustment capacity for many producers. Observed responses following earlier buy-up removals indicate modest shifts toward higher coverage among former buy-up users, but incomplete restoration of PP protection. Under the 2018 Farm Bill, declining subsidy rates would have rendered substitution prohibitively costly. Enhanced premium subsidies under the One Big Beautiful Bill substantially reduce (but do not eliminate) these cost increases, producing uneven distributional effects that depend on initial coverage positions rather than PP risk alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsiboe, Francis, 2026. "Prevented Planting After Buy-Up Elimination: Coverage Level Substitution, Producer Costs, and the Role of Enhanced Premium Subsidies Under the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB)," ARPC White Paper 386196, North Dakota State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwp:386196
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.386196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/386196/files/ARPC%20White%20Paper%202026-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.386196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwp:386196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ndsu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.