IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/arpcwo/386093.html

Routine Actuarial Adjustments Cut Taxpayer Cost in Subsidized Agricultural Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Tsiboe, Francis

Abstract

The substantial fiscal commitment of government-subsidized agricultural insurance highlights its critical role in supporting farmers, yet it also reveals the program’s financial vulnerability amid debates over fiscal cuts aimed at easing pressure on the public purse. Central to these debates is the need for actuarially sound premium rates. This study, which analyzes more than three million observations across 33 commodities from 2001 to 2024 in the United States context, examines how innovations in ratemaking affect taxpayer obligations. The findings indicate that updating the parameters used to calculate crop insurance costs for farmers can significantly reduce taxpayer expenses. Updating all the ratemaking parameters together saves about 10% annually, however, targeting just one component, such as the reference yields, can yield annual savings of up to 13%. Although most states benefit from these updates, precise ratemaking falls short in a few cases. Overall, the results highlight the complexities of setting premium rates that are both actuarially and fiscally sound, suggesting that smarter, targeted updates could improve the efficiency of the program and alleviate the financial burden on taxpayers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsiboe, Francis, 2025. "Routine Actuarial Adjustments Cut Taxpayer Cost in Subsidized Agricultural Insurance," ARPC Working Paper 386093, North Dakota State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwo:386093
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.386093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/386093/files/ARPC%20Working%20Paper%202025-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.386093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taro Mieno & Cory G Walters & Lilyan E Fulginiti, 2018. "Input Use under Crop Insurance: The Role of Actual Production History," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1469-1485.
    2. Jerry R. Skees & Michael R. Reed, 1986. "Rate Making for Farm-Level Crop Insurance: Implications for Adverse Selection," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 653-659.
    3. Vincent H. Smith & Joseph W. Glauber, 2012. "Agricultural Insurance in Developed Countries: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 363-390.
    4. Quiggin, John C. & Karagiannis, Giannis & Stanton, J., 1993. "Crop Insurance And Crop Production: An Empirical Study Of Moral Hazard And Adverse Selection," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(2), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Woodard, Joshua D. & Sherrick, Bruce J. & Schnitkey, Gary D., 2011. "Actuarial Impacts of Loss Cost Ratio Ratemaking in U.S. Crop Insurance Programs," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(01), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Joshua D. Woodard & Leslie J. Verteramo‐Chiu, 2017. "Efficiency Impacts of Utilizing Soil Data in the Pricing of the Federal Crop Insurance Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 99(3), pages 757-772, April.
    7. Eunchun Park & B Wade Brorsen & Ardian Harri, 2019. "Using Bayesian Kriging for Spatial Smoothing in Crop Insurance Rating," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(1), pages 330-351.
    8. Jisang Yu & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2020. "Input Use Decisions with Greater Information on Crop Conditions: Implications for Insurance Moral Hazard and the Environment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 826-845, May.
    9. Jing Yi & Henry L. Bryant & James W. Richardson, 2020. "How do premium subsidies affect crop insurance demand at different coverage levels: the case of corn," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(1), pages 5-28, January.
    10. Dylan Turner & Francis Tsiboe & Hunter Biram & Lawson Connor, 2025. "Actuarial implications of prevented planting coverage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 394-415, March.
    11. Yu Na Lee, 2021. "Does Aversion to Price Risk Drive Migration? Evidence from Rural Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1268-1293, August.
    12. Vincent H. Smith & Joseph W. Glauber, 2012. "Agricultural Insurance in Developed Countries: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 363-390.
    13. Roderick M. Rejesus & Barry K. Goodwin & Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight, 2010. "Evaluation of the reference yield calculation method in crop insurance," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(3), pages 427-445, November.
    14. Ramirez, Octavio A. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Rejesus, Roderick M., 2011. "Can Crop Insurance Premiums Be Reliably Estimated?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "The crop insurance demand response to premium subsidies: Evidence from U.S. Agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Joshua D. Woodard & Leslie J. Verteramo-Chiu, 2017. "Efficiency Impacts of Utilizing Soil Data in the Pricing of the Federal Crop Insurance Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 757-772.
    17. Turner, Dylan & Tsiboe, Francis & Baldwin, Katherine & Williams, Brian & Dohlman, Erik & Astill, Gregory & Skorbiansky, Sharon Raszap & Abadam, Vidalina & Yeh, D. Adeline & Knight, Russell, 2023. "Federal Programs for Agricultural Risk Management," Economic Information Bulletin 340216, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Yong Liu & A. Ford Ramsey, 2023. "Incorporating historical weather information in crop insurance rating," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 546-575, March.
    19. Dylan Turner & Francis Tsiboe, 2022. "The crop insurance demand response to the Wildfire and Hurricane Indemnity Program Plus," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1273-1292, September.
    20. Roderick M. Rejesus & Barry K. Goodwin & Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight, 2010. "Evaluation of the reference yield calculation method in crop insurance," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(3), pages 427-445, November.
    21. Maisashvili, Aleksandre & Bryant, Henry L. & Jones, Jason P.H., 2020. "Implications of Alternative Crop Insurance Subsidies," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 240-263, May.
    22. Jayson L. Lusk, 2017. "Distributional Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-15.
    23. Carl H. Nelson, 1990. "The Influence of Distributional Assumptions on the Calculation of Crop Insurance Premia," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 71-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "Econometric identification of crop insurance participation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 476-497, December.
    2. Tsiboe, Francis, & Turner, Dylan & Aglasan, Serkan & Rejesus, Roderick M, 2026. "Rate Revisions and Risk Transfer Incentives in Agricultural Insurance," ARPC Working Paper 396238, North Dakota State University.
    3. Francis Tsiboe & Jesse Tack, 2022. "Utilizing Topographic and Soil Features to Improve Rating for Farm‐Level Insurance Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 52-69, January.
    4. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "The crop insurance demand response to premium subsidies: Evidence from U.S. Agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Paloch Suchato & Taro Mieno & Karina Schoengold & Timothy Foster, 2022. "The potential for moral hazard behavior in irrigation decisions under crop insurance," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 257-273, March.
    6. Glauber, Joseph W., 2017. "Agricultural insurance and the WTO:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Sloggy, Matthew R. & Hrozencik, R. Aaron & Manning, Dale T. & Goemans, Chris G. & Claassen, Roger L., 2025. "Insurance and extraction incentives in a common pool resource: Evidence from groundwater use in the high plains," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Dylan Turner & Francis Tsiboe & Hunter Biram & Lawson Connor, 2025. "Actuarial implications of prevented planting coverage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 394-415, March.
    9. Sankalp Sharma & Cory G. Walters, 2020. "Influence of farm size and insured type on crop insurance returns," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 440-452, June.
    10. Bougherara, Douadia & Piet, Laurent, 2014. "The Impact of Farmers’ Risk Preferences on the Design of an Individual Yield Crop Insurance," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183082, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Jennifer Ifft & Margaret Jodlowski, 2024. "Farm heterogeneity and leveraging federal crop insurance for conservation practice adoption," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 572-594, June.
    12. Delbridge, Timothy A. & King, Robert P., 2016. "How Important is the T-Yield? An Analysis of Reforms to Organic Crop Insurance," Staff Papers 244732, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Chengguo Weng & Lysa Porth & Ken Seng Tan & Ryan Samaratunga, 2017. "Modelling the Sustainability of the Canadian Crop Insurance Program: A Reserve Fund Process Under a Public–Private Partnership Model," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(2), pages 226-246, April.
    14. Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2021. "The role of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in enhancing and stabilising farm income: an analysis of income transfer efficiency and the Income Stabilisation Tool," Papers 2104.14188, arXiv.org.
    15. Mauro Vigani & Jonas Kathage, 2019. "To Risk or Not to Risk? Risk Management and Farm Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1432-1454, October.
    16. Octavio A. Ramirez & Carlos A. Carpio, 2012. "Premium estimation inaccuracy and the actuarial performance of the US crop insurance program," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(1), pages 117-133, May.
    17. Kim, Youngho, 2023. "Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs and Climate Change Adaptation in Agriculture," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335971, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Boyd, Chris M. & Bellemare, Marc F., 2022. "Why not insure prices? Experimental evidence from Peru," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 580-631.
    19. repec:ags:aaea22:335971 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Vilhelm, V. & Špička, J. & Valder, A., . "Public Support of Agricultural Risk Management – Situation and Prospects," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10.
    21. William M. Fonta & Safietou Sanfo & Abbi M. Kedir & Djiby R. Thiam, 2018. "Estimating farmers’ willingness to pay for weather index-based crop insurance uptake in West Africa: Insight from a pilot initiative in Southwestern Burkina Faso," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwo:386093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ndsu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.