IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/arpcbr/393785.html

Routine Pricing Adjustments Help Keep Crop Insurance Costs in Check

Author

Listed:
  • Tsiboe, Francis
  • Osei, Evelyn

Abstract

Government-subsidized agricultural insurance plays a central role in managing farm risk in the United States but also represents a substantial and growing cost to taxpayers. This study examines how routine actuarial updates to insurance pricing affect taxpayer outlays in the U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Program. Using a counterfactual simulation framework and national actuarial and summary-of-business data from 2002 to 2024, the analysis compares observed outcomes with scenarios in which insurance rates were not updated from one year to the next. The results show that routine actuarial adjustments are associated with significant reductions in taxpayer costs, averaging about 10 percent per year under the full Risk Management Agency update pattern. Targeted updates to specific pricing components, particularly reference yields, generate even larger cost reductions. These savings arise from improved alignment between premiums and realized loss risk and occur without reductions in premium subsidies or coverage levels. The findings highlight the importance of pricing accuracy for the fiscal performance and long-run sustainability of the crop insurance program.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsiboe, Francis & Osei, Evelyn, 2026. "Routine Pricing Adjustments Help Keep Crop Insurance Costs in Check," ARPC Brief 393785, North Dakota State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:arpcbr:393785
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.393785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/393785/files/ARPC%20Brief%202026-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.393785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arpcbr:393785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ndsu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.