Author
Listed:
- Tsiboe, Francis
- Chakravorty, Rwit
- Zhao, Hongxi
Abstract
Prevented planting (PP) coverage is a key component of the Federal Crop Insurance Program, providing indemnities when adverse weather prevents timely planting and reimbursing early-season production costs. Historically, producers could enhance this protection through optional PP buy-up coverage, which increased PP indemnities without affecting coverage against other yield or revenue losses. Recent policy changes eliminate all PP buy-up options beginning with the 2026 crop year, embedding planting-season risk management entirely within the underlying insurance coverage decision. This article examines whether and how producers can substitute higher coverage levels for the loss of targeted PP buy-up protection. Using administrative data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Risk Management Agency, the analysis documents both the mechanical feasibility of coverage-level substitution and observed producer responses following the earlier removal of the 10 percent buy-up in 2018. Results show that modest increases in coverage can approximate former buy-up protection at intermediate coverage levels, but substitution becomes nonlinear and constrained as producers approach the 85 percent coverage ceiling. Observed behavior indicates gradual and incomplete shifts toward higher coverage among former buy-up users, with limited adjustment among producers already near coverage limits. Overall, the findings suggest that eliminating PP buy-ups reduces producers’ ability to manage planting-season risk in a targeted manner and shifts risk management toward broader, costlier coverage choices. This transition has implications for producer-paid premiums, program subsidies, and the overall exposure of the Federal Crop Insurance Program to in-season losses.
Suggested Citation
Tsiboe, Francis & Chakravorty, Rwit & Zhao, Hongxi, 2026.
"Ending Prevented Planting Buy-Ups Changes Insurance Choices and Expands Program Risk,"
ARPC Brief
388966, North Dakota State University.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:arpcbr:388966
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.388966
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arpcbr:388966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ndsu.edu/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.