IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes026/397919.html

Understanding UK Red Meat Consumption for Health and Climate Policy: A Disaggregated Demand Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rathnayaka, Shashika D.
  • Revoredo-Giha, Cesar
  • Chalmers, Neil
  • de Roos, Baukje

Abstract

Understanding UK consumer responses to meat prices is critical for health, environmental, and fiscal policy. While red and processed meat consumption remains above recommended levels for some consumers, contributing to cardiovascular disease & colorectal cancer risk, and greenhouse gas emissions, most empirical studies treat red meat as a single aggregate category, masking important heterogeneity in beef purchasing patterns. Using the data from Kantar Worldpanel data for 2013–2022, this study estimates expenditure and price elasticities for a disaggregated set of beef products, alongside lamb, pork, poultry, fish, and other meat products. A dynamic two-stage error-corrected LA/AIDS model was applied to capture gradual adjustment and long-run equilibrium relationships. Results reveal substantial heterogeneity in own- and cross-price elasticities across beef products, with pronounced vertical differentiation within beef, and complex substitution and complementarity patterns across meat groups, that are obscured in aggregate models. Short-run elasticities are often smaller in magnitude than long-run elasticities, reflecting consumption inertia and gradual adjustment. Statistically significant error-correction terms confirm stable long-run relationships across both aggregate and disaggregated systems. These findings provide robust evidence to inform targeted fiscal and pricing policies aimed at promoting healthier and more sustainable dietary transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rathnayaka, Shashika D. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Chalmers, Neil & de Roos, Baukje, 2026. "Understanding UK Red Meat Consumption for Health and Climate Policy: A Disaggregated Demand Analysis," 100th Annual Conference, March 23-25, 2026, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 397919, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397919
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.397919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397919/files/Shashika_Rathnayaka_Rathnayaka%20et%20al%20-%20Meat%20demand%20in%20the%20UK-Dynamic%20disaggrgated%20analyisis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.397919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fousekis, Panos & Revell, Brian J., 2000. "Meat Demand In The Uk: A Differential Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(01), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Michael Burton & Trevor Young & Roy Cromb, 1999. "Meat consumers’ long-term response to perceived risks associated with BSE in Great Britain," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 50, pages 7-19.
    3. Ghazi Shukur, 2002. "Dynamic specification and misspecification in systems of demand equations: a testing strategy for model selection," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 709-725.
    4. John Eakins & Liam Gallagher, 2003. "Dynamic almost ideal demand systems: an empirical analysis of alcohol expenditure in Ireland," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 1025-1036.
    5. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Karagiannis, G. & Katranidis, S. & Velentzas, K., 2000. "An error correction almost ideal demand system for meat in Greece," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 29-35, January.
    7. K.G. Balcombe & J.R. Davis, 1996. "An application of cointegration theory in the estimation of the Almost Ideal Demand system for food consumption in Bulgaria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(1), pages 47-60, September.
    8. Burton, Michael & Young, Trevor, 1992. "The Structure of Changing Tastes for Meat and Fish in Great Britain," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 165-180.
    9. Gordon Anderson & Richard Blundell, 1983. "Testing Restrictions in a Flexible Dynamic Demand System: An Application to Consumers' Expenditure in Canada," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 50(3), pages 397-410.
    10. Marco Springmann & Michael Clark & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Keith Wiebe & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Luis Lassaletta & Wim Vries & Sonja J. Vermeulen & Mario Herrero & Kimberly M. Carlson & Malin Jonell & , 2018. "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 519-525, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saroja Selvanathan & Maneka Jayasinghe & Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan & Shashika D. Rathnayaka, 2024. "Dynamic modelling of consumption patterns using LA-AIDS: a comparative study of developed versus developing countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 75-135, January.
    2. Li, Gang & Song, Haiyan & Witt, Stephen F., 2006. "Time varying parameter and fixed parameter linear AIDS: An application to tourism demand forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 57-71.
    3. Stefan Wirsenius & Fredrik Hedenus & Kristina Mohlin, 2011. "Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 159-184, September.
    4. Minoas Koukouritakis, 2003. "EU Accession Effects on Imports of Manufactures: The case of Greece," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 2-2003, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    5. Sulgham, Anil K. & Zapata, Hector O., 2006. "A Dynamic Approach to Estimate Theoretically Consistent US Meat Demand System," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35441, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Fousekis, Panos & Revell, Brian J., 2002. "Primary Demand for Red Meats in the United Kingdom," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 63.
    7. Baek, Ji Won, 2016. "The effects of the Internet and mobile services on urban household expenditures: The case of South Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 22-38.
    8. Toshinobu Matsuda, 2007. "Linearizing the inverse quadratic almost ideal demand system," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 381-396.
    9. Sean Pascoe & Peggy Schrobback & Eriko Hoshino & Robert Curtotti, 2023. "Impact of changes in imports and farmed salmon on wild-caught fish prices in Australia," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 335-359.
    10. John Curtis & Brian Stanley, 2016. "Analysing Residential Energy Demand: An Error Correction Demand System Approach for Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 47(2), pages 185-211.
    11. Rangkakulnuwat, Poomthan & Wang, H. Holly & Ahn, Sung K., 2007. "The inverse imported factor demand system in Thailand: A cointegration analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 402-407, March.
    12. Paul Fesenfeld, Lukas & Maier, Maiken & Brazzola, Nicoletta & Stolz, Niklas & Sun, Yixian & Kachi, Aya, 2023. "How information, social norms, and experience with novel meat substitutes can create positive political feedback and demand-side policy change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Zhou, De & Yu, Xiaohua & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2015. "Dynamic food demand in urban China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 27-44.
    14. Muhammad, Andrew & Jones, Keithly G., 2009. "An Assessment of Dynamic Behavior in the U.S. Catfish Market: An Application of the Generalized Dynamic Rotterdam Model," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Duffy, Martyn, 2003. "On the estimation of an advertising-augmented, cointegrating demand system," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 181-206, January.
    16. Wang, Xiaojin & Reed, Michael, 2013. "Estimation of Import Demand for Fishery Products in the U.S. Using the Source-Differentiated AIDS Model," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150207, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Paul Dunne & Beverly Edkins, 2005. "The demand for Food in South Africa," Working Papers 0509, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    18. Meier, Johanna & Andor, Mark A. & Doebbe, Friederike C. & Haddaway, Neal R. & Reisch, Lucia A., 2022. "Review: Do green defaults reduce meat consumption?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Morrison, J. A. & Balcombe, K. & Bailey, A. & Klonaris, S. & Rapsomanikis, G., 2003. "Expenditure on different categories of meat in Greece: the influence of changing tastes," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 139-150, March.
    20. Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2006. "Testing Separability between Import and Domestic Commodities: Application to U.S. Meat Demand in a Dynamic Model," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35267, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.