IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes026/397897.html

How uncertainty and risk preferences shape participation in outcome-based forest carbon PES: A discrete choice and lottery experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Qi
  • Hanley, Nick
  • Yi, Yuanyuan
  • Xu, Jintao
  • Kontoleon, Andreas

Abstract

Payment for Ecosystem Service (PES) schemes, particularly those involving tree-planting initiatives, are increasingly recognized for their great potential to mitigate carbon emissions and address climate change. Among them, Outcome-Based Payments (also known as results-based schemes) have gained attention for their cost-effectiveness and potential to improve environmental efficiency. This study examines farmers’ preferences towards participating in an outcome-based tree planting scheme using a discrete choice experiment conducted in Yunnan, China. We explicitly incorporate uncertainty in environmental outcomes, which in turn affects payment structures. We also elicit farmers’ risk perceptions through incentivized field lottery games and examine its influence on participation decisions and marginal willingness-to-accept (WTA). Based on a sample of 340 respondents, we find that farmers’ willingness to participate is significantly influenced by contract attributes, including the subsidy level, provision of training and technical guidance, environmental performance requirements, and the degree of uncertainty involved. Our findings further highlight the role of uncertainty and risk perceptions in shaping farmers’ decision-making processes in outcome-based PES.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Qi & Hanley, Nick & Yi, Yuanyuan & Xu, Jintao & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2026. "How uncertainty and risk preferences shape participation in outcome-based forest carbon PES: A discrete choice and lottery experiment in China," 100th Annual Conference, March 23-25, 2026, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 397897, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397897
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.397897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397897/files/Qi%20_Liu_Manuscript_How%20uncertainty%20and%20risk%20preferences%20shape%20participation%20in%20outcome.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.397897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.