IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes026/397887.html

Evaluating the environmental effects of taxes and subsidies on animal and plant proteins in Scotland using home scan data

Author

Listed:
  • Rompani, Hugo
  • Dogbe, Wisdom
  • Revoredo-Giha, Cesar

Abstract

To achieve its ambitious climate targets, it is likely that Scotland will have to shift the food consumption of households away from animal proteins. This paper analysed the effectiveness of taxes and subsidies on animal and plant proteins in improving the environmental sustainability of protein consumption in Scotland. It was found that taxes on animal proteins alone struggle to shift consumption towards plant proteins. However, plant protein subsidies achieved dietary shifts toward plant protein categories. The study also highlighted that a blanket tax on all animal proteins, while most effective in reducing total environmental impact of protein consumption, could result in significant negative nutritional and distributional outcomes; thereby reducing the tax’s viability as a policy option. The study concludes that a combination of select taxes and subsidies, along with a mix of alternative policy options, are best suited to shifting Scottish diets in a more environmentally and socially sustainable direction – however, to achieve the Climate Change Committee’s dietary recommendations a mixture of policy levers will likely be required. The study used 2021 home scan data from Kantar Worldpanel and the Exact Affine Stone Index demand system to estimate Marshallian elasticities for protein categories in Scotland. These were used to simulate a range of ad valorem fiscal policy scenarios, which were then evaluated for their impact on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, nutritional intake and welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Rompani, Hugo & Dogbe, Wisdom & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2026. "Evaluating the environmental effects of taxes and subsidies on animal and plant proteins in Scotland using home scan data," 100th Annual Conference, March 23-25, 2026, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 397887, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397887
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.397887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397887/files/Hugo_Rompani_AES%20Paper%20Edit%20-%20Final%20edit.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.397887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adélaïde & Nichèle, Véronique, 2019. "Assessing the distributional effects of carbon taxes on food: Inequalities and nutritional insights in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 20-31.
    2. Richard Blundell & Xiaohong Chen & Dennis Kristensen, 2007. "Semi-Nonparametric IV Estimation of Shape-Invariant Engel Curves," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(6), pages 1613-1669, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Chetverikov & Daniel Wilhelm, 2017. "Nonparametric instrumental variable estimation under monotonicity," CeMMAP working papers 14/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Anastasiia Timofeeva, 2015. "On endogeneity of consumer expenditures in the estimation of households demand system," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 37(1), pages 87-106.
    3. Chen, Xiaohong & Reiss, Markus, 2011. "On Rate Optimality For Ill-Posed Inverse Problems In Econometrics," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 497-521, June.
    4. Muller, Christophe, 2018. "Heterogeneity and nonconstant effect in two-stage quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 3-12.
    5. Christoph Breunig, 2019. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests based on Series Estimators in Nonparametric Instrumental Regression," Papers 1909.10133, arXiv.org.
    6. Shoya Ishimaru, 2024. "Empirical Decomposition of the IV-OLS Gap with Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Effects," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(2), pages 505-520, March.
    7. Jean‐Pierre Florens & Jan Johannes & Sébastien Van Bellegem, 2012. "Instrumental regression in partially linear models," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 15(2), pages 304-324, June.
    8. Schaper, Julian & Franks, Max & Koch, Nicolas & Plinke, Charlotte & Sureth, Michael, 2025. "Corrigendum to ”On the emission and distributional effects of a CO2eq-tax on agricultural goods—The case of Germany” [Food Policy 130 (2025) 102794]," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Manuel Arellano & Richard Blundell & Stéphane Bonhomme, 2017. "Earnings and Consumption Dynamics: A Nonlinear Panel Data Framework," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 693-734, May.
    10. Su, Liangjun & Lu, Xun, 2013. "Nonparametric dynamic panel data models: Kernel estimation and specification testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 112-133.
    11. Sokullu, Senay, 2023. "More Is Better, Or Not? An Empirical Analysis of Buyer Preferences for Variety on the E-Market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 450-470.
    12. Chiappori, Pierre-Andre & Komunjer, Ivana, 2008. "Correct Specification and Identification of Nonparametric Transformation Models," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4v12m2rg, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    13. Kim Kyoo il & Petrin Amil, 2022. "A Generalized Non-Parametric Instrumental Variable-Control Function Approach to Estimation in Nonlinear Settings," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 91-125, January.
    14. Andrew Chesher & Adam M. Rosen, 2021. "Counterfactual Worlds," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 142, pages 311-335.
    15. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    16. Ramírez–Hassan, Andrés & López-Vera, Alejandro, 2024. "Welfare implications of a tax on electricity: A semi-parametric specification of the incomplete EASI demand system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Xiaohong Chen & Timothy M. Christensen, 2015. "Optimal sup-norm rates, adaptivity and inference in nonparametric instrumental variables estimation," CeMMAP working papers 32/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Andr'es Ram'irez-Hassan & Alejandro L'opez-Vera, 2021. "Semi-parametric estimation of the EASI model: Welfare implications of taxes identifying clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity," Papers 2109.07646, arXiv.org.
    19. Breunig, Christoph & Mammen, Enno & Simoni, Anna, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation in case of endogenous selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 268-285.
    20. Valérie Lechene & Krishna Pendakur & Alexander Wolf, 2020. "OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of expenditure," IFS Working Papers W20/6, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.