IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes026/397886.html

Estimating China’s Buyer Market Power in the International Pork Market: Empirical Evidence from the Residual Supply Elasticity Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr

Abstract

This study estimates China’s buyer market power in the international pork market using monthly data from 2010 to 2024. Single- and multi-equation residual supply elasticity (RSE) models are estimated via two-stage (2SLS) and three-stage least squares (3SLS) for six major exporters: Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Spain, and the United States. Results indicate substantial oligopsony power in China’s import market, with estimated price markdowns ranging from 7% to 29%, showing significant variation across exporters. Brazil exhibits the highest markdowns, reflecting its growing dependence on the Chinese market, whereas Germany exhibits the lowest. These findings underscore China’s dominant role in international pork trade and have important implications for trade and competition policy. The study contributes to the literature by applying RSE models to estimate oligopsony power in international pork markets, where empirical evidence on buyer power remains limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr, 2026. "Estimating China’s Buyer Market Power in the International Pork Market: Empirical Evidence from the Residual Supply Elasticity Approach," 100th Annual Conference, March 23-25, 2026, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 397886, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397886
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.397886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397886/files/Oleksandr_Perekhozhuk_Contributed_Paper_Perekhozhuk_China_Pork_Market.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.397886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.