IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes026/397869.html

An Assessment of Scottish Farmers’ Orientation Toward Change and Its Association with Future Behavioural Intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Begho, Toritseju
  • Asmare, Fissha
  • Glenk, Klaus

Abstract

Farmers face a range of structural, environmental and market adjustments that require continual adaptation in management practices and decision-making. Understanding how farmers respond to change is central to promoting adaptability and resilience in agriculture. This study examines Scottish farmers’ dispositional orientation toward change using data from a Farmer Intentions (FIS) 2023 survey. Thirteen Likert-scale statements, adapted from Oreg’s (2003) Resistance to Change (RTC) framework, were used to elicit farmers’ orientation toward change. The Likert-scale items were used to construct a composite behavioural change-cautious orientation (CCO) index following psychometric validation where a higher value indicate a stronger change-cautious orientation, whereas lower values reflect greater openness to change. The index was analysed using ANOVA and regression methods to examine demographic, social and perceptual determinants of behavioural orientation, and to assess how openness to change influences farmers’ future investment and environmental intentions. Two underlying dimensions were identified, namely, aversion to disruption in daily practices, and openness to embrace behavioural and managerial change. CCO varied with farmer type, group membership, age and percentage of household income that comes from the farm business. Business-oriented and group-affiliated farmers exhibited a weaker CCO, whereas crofters, hobbyists, smallholders, and especially the oldest farmers showed a stronger CCO. Farmers with a weaker CCO were significantly more likely to plan increased investment and participation in agri-environmental activities. Farmers with weaker CCO are also more likely to adopt sustainable agricultural practices. These results indicate that openness to change among Scottish farmers is structured by type, farmer group-affiliation and experience. Differentiated engagement strategies are needed to strengthen farmers’ orientation toward change. Therefore, policies that combine business-focused advisory support with network-based learning for different farmers’ enterprise type can help reduce behavioural inertia and encourage forward-looking investment and environmental action.

Suggested Citation

  • Begho, Toritseju & Asmare, Fissha & Glenk, Klaus, 2026. "An Assessment of Scottish Farmers’ Orientation Toward Change and Its Association with Future Behavioural Intentions," 100th Annual Conference, March 23-25, 2026, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 397869, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397869
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.397869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397869/files/Toritseju_Begho_RTC_v3_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.397869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason A. Hubbart, 2023. "Organizational Change: The Challenge of Change Aversion," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Bethan Thompson & Gaëlle Leduc & Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska & Luiza Toma & Helena Hansson, 2024. "Farmers' adoption of ecological practices: A systematic literature map," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 84-107, February.
    3. Oriana Bandiera & Imran Rasul, 2006. "Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(514), pages 869-902, October.
    4. Huber, Robert & Späti, Karin & Finger, Robert, 2023. "A behavioural agent-based modelling approach for the ex-ante assessment of policies supporting precision agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Doris Läpple & Hugh Kelley, 2015. "Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 42(2), pages 315-337.
    6. Francisco J. Sarabia-Sanchez & Isabel P. Riquelme & Juan Manuel Bruno, 2021. "Resistance to Change and Perceived Risk as Determinants of Water-Saving Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Andrew Barnes & Helena Hansson & Larissa Billaudet & Gaëlle Leduc & Gordana Manevska Tasevska & Mary Ryan & Bethan Thompson & Luiza Toma & Sabine Duvaleix‐Tréguer & Irene Tzouramani, 2022. "European Farmer Perspectives and their Adoption of Ecological Practices," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 5-12, December.
    8. de Lauwere, Carolien & Slegers, Monique & Meeusen, Marieke, 2022. "The influence of behavioural factors and external conditions on Dutch farmers’ decision making in the transition towards circular agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Fabian Klebl & Peter H. Feindt & Annette Piorr, 2024. "Farmers’ behavioural determinants of on-farm biodiversity management in Europe: a systematic review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(2), pages 831-861, June.
    10. Louise Manning, 2024. "Innovating in an Uncertain World: Understanding the Social, Technical and Systemic Barriers to Farmers Adopting New Technologies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Poorvi Iyer & Martina Bozzola & Stefan Hirsch & Manuela Meraner & Robert Finger, 2020. "Measuring Farmer Risk Preferences in Europe: A Systematic Review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 3-26, February.
    12. François J Dessart & Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé & René van Bavel, 2019. "Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(3), pages 417-471.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Finger, Robert & Sok, Jaap & Ahovi, Emmanuel & Akter, Sharmin & Bremmer, Johan & Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, Silke & de Lauwere, Carolien & Kreft, Cordelia & Kudsk, Per & Lambarraa-Lehnhardt, Fatima & McCallum, 2024. "Towards sustainable crop protection in agriculture: A framework for research and policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    3. Yanbing Wang & Niklas Möhring & Robert Finger, 2023. "When my neighbors matter: Spillover effects in the adoption of large‐scale pesticide‐free wheat production," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 256-273, March.
    4. Massfeller, Anna & Meraner, Manuela & Hüttel, Silke & Uehleke, Reinhard, 2022. "Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Abdusame Tadjiev & Nodir Djanibekov & Mawussi Kossivi Soviadan & Thomas Herzfeld, 2025. "Participation in Informal Cooperation in Water Management and Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Empirical Evidence From Uzbekistan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(4), pages 820-835, October.
    6. Julia B. Block & Michael Danne & Oliver Mußhoff, 2026. "Who Are the Farmers Participating in a Carbon Sequestration Program? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 590-602, April.
    7. Qianchun Dai & Kequn Cheng, 2022. "What Drives the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies? An Extension of TAM in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Shrestha, Sujata & Shrestha, Uttam Babu & Shrestha, Bibek Raj & Maharjan, Shirish & Udas, Erica & Aryal, Kamal, 2024. "Determinants of adoption of climate resilient agricultural solutions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Tuan Nguyen‐Anh & Do Pham‐Thanh & Anh Dao‐Viet & Nguyen To‐The, 2025. "Do Community‐Oriented Farmers Present a Greater Willingness for Organic Transition: Evidence From Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(6), pages 1168-1191, November.
    10. Alexis H. Villacis & Jeffrey R. Alwang & Victor Barrera & Juan Dominguez, 2022. "Prices, specialty varieties, and postharvest practices: Insights from cacao value chains in Ecuador," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 426-458, April.
    11. Scherfranz, Verena & Schaak, Henning & Kantelhardt, Jochen & Reimand, Karl & Braito, Michael & Bodea, Flaviu V. & Costache, Cristina & Popa, Răzvan & de Vries, Reinier & Kleijn, David & Kadulin, Aki &, 2025. "Farmers'perceived financial and non-financial costs of their biodiversity measures – Exploring viewpoints with Q-methodology," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. Chandan Singha, 2017. "Analyzing Adoption of soil Conservation Measures by Farmers in Darjeeling District, India," Working Papers id:12204, eSocialSciences.
    13. Shengyi Du & Katsuya Tanaka & Hironori Yagi, 2025. "Farmers’ Adoption of Water Management Practice for Methane Reduction in Rice Paddies: A Spatial Analysis in Shiga, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Fuad, Syed & Hartarska, Valentina & Nadolnyak, Denis, 2026. "Why Beginning Farmers Differ: Scale, Community, and Productivity Dispersion in U.S. Agriculture," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404709, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Marius Eisele & Christian Troost & Thomas Berger, 2021. "How Bayesian Are Farmers When Making Climate Adaptation Decisions? A Computer Laboratory Experiment for Parameterising Models of Expectation Formation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 805-828, September.
    16. Jens Rommel & Julian Sagebiel & Marieke Cornelia Baaken & Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé & Douadia Bougherara & Luigi Cembalo & Marija Cerjak & Tajana Čop & Mikołaj Czajkowski & María Espinosa‐Goded & Julia Höh, 2023. "Farmers' risk preferences in 11 European farming systems: A multi‐country replication of Bocquého et al. ()," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1374-1399, September.
    17. Bethan Thompson & Gaëlle Leduc & Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska & Luiza Toma & Helena Hansson, 2024. "Farmers' adoption of ecological practices: A systematic literature map," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 84-107, February.
    18. Do, Huu-Luat & Cherry, Todd L., 2025. "Ghost fishing and the voluntary adoption of biodegradable gear," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Cordelia Kreft & Robert Huber & David Schäfer & Robert Finger, 2024. "Quantifying the impact of farmers' social networks on the effectiveness of climate change mitigation policies in agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 298-322, February.
    20. Ladina Knapp & David Wuepper & Robert Finger, 2021. "Preferences, personality, aspirations, and farmer behavior," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 901-913, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes026:397869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.