IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes025/356758.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intermediaries with Market Power and the Impact of Agricultural Trade Liberalisation

Author

Listed:
  • May, Daniel E.
  • McCorriston, Steve

Abstract

The issue of market power in agricultural and food markets is typically addressed in the context of domestic markets. In this paper, we consider the impact of market power in the outcome of trade agreements involving a number of countries. The issue of market power is set in the context of growth of preferential trade agreements has been one of the main features of trade policy over the last 20 years. To address these issues, we present a network model of trade where intermediaries in each country can have both seller and buyer power. Buyer power is of particular relevance to this framework since we know from standard trade theory that trade reform can bring pro-competitive effects from trade. However, the exercise of buyer power can potentially offset the potential gains from trade liberalisation. We show in this paper that the impact of buyer power on expanding trade agreements will depend on the nature of trade between countries, whether countries differ in market size, and the existence of already established trade agreements. We highlight the insights from the network trade model with an empirical example of a trade agreement between the UK and the US.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356758
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356758
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356758/files/Daniel_May_Article%20AES.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.356758?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.