IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare20/305250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dairying regions in Victoria: Risk profiles using historical data and @RISK®

Author

Listed:
  • Godfrey, Sosheel
  • Nordblom, Thomas
  • Ip, Ryan
  • Hutchings, Timothy

Abstract

The paper asks, “What comparisons of farm financial risk characterise the key Victorian dairy regions over the past 13 years?” The dairy industry is the 3rd largest rural industry in Australia. The dairy farmers, though, are facing a continuous cost price squeeze amid a challenging global environment that suppresses milk prices and raises feed costs in the face of drier and hotter weather conditions. For this analysis, we focused on three key Victorian dairy regions, namely North (N), Gippsland (G) and South West (SW) which have a combined share of 67% in Australia's milk production. We analysed the financial risks of these regions based on a representative farm from each region. Balance sheet, profit and loss budget and cash flow were integrated to create a probabilistic model using Palisade’s @RISK version 7.6. The variability in historical inputs of dairy prices, quantities and costs for thirteen years from 2006-07 to 2018-19 in Victorian dairy regions was captured using a multivariate copula in @RISK. We, thus, generated decadal (10-year) distributions of profit and loss budgets, balance sheets and cash flows to simulate risks with one hundred thousand iterations under Monte Carlo method. The simulation showed that the net farm income was positive 55, 70 and 80 percent of decades respectively for farms in North, Gippsland and South West regions. Sensitivity analysis of the variable components of income, production and cost and their contributions to variance in net farm income showed that the price of milk was the largest source of variation in net farm income for all regions. Variations in feed costs were greatest in the North region compared to the other two. At the close of a decade (year 10), South West region outperformed on all accounts, including debt repayments, building/retaining equity, return of capital (ROC) and return on investment (ROE) and, thus, appeared the most viable for dairying. The business and financial risk for dairy farms based on variability in production, prices and costs was captured in this analysis by using historical data. We extended its usefulness through @RISK by illuminating their recent probabilistic risk profiles. The method allowed us to summarise the long-term portfolios of farm net profits, debt management and key performance indicators of ROC and ROE. There is a need to extend this analysis to capture the shortages and rising costs of water, particularly in the Northern region.

Suggested Citation

  • Godfrey, Sosheel & Nordblom, Thomas & Ip, Ryan & Hutchings, Timothy, 2020. "Dairying regions in Victoria: Risk profiles using historical data and @RISK®," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305250, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare20:305250
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305250/files/218DairyingregionsinVictoria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare20:305250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.