IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare06/139893.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Price and Product Competition from Imports in the Preserved Mushrooms Market in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Rodgers, Trudi
  • Fleming, Euan M.
  • Villano, Renato A.

Abstract

The Australian preserved mushrooms industry is one of a number of industries in the horticultural sector that is under threat from cheaper imported products. The Australian Customs Service is currently investigating the alleged dumping of Chinese imported cans of preserved mushrooms that feature prominently on supermarket shelves. Evidence exists that cheaper imported Chinese products have incurred injury in the Australian market. These Chinese imports have penetrated the Australian preserved mushroom industry and compete intensely on price, although the one remaining domestic producer in the Australian market claims stronger brand loyalty. However, it is possible that concentration on price competition might lead to a neglect of more damaging long-term product competition from these imports. We highlight the nature and extent of this competition by identifying demand, price and expenditure relationships between local and imported preserved mushrooms. Of four propositions tested in the analysis, two were supported but results of the other two tests were contrary to expectations. It was expected that the Australian producer competed more on brand recognition than price but evidence suggests otherwise. Also, it was expected that consumers would prefer a domestic ‘lite’ product over other domestic products with greater health-consciousness among consumers as incomes increase. Yet, while this product has the highest expenditure elasticity of demand among domestic products, it did not command a significantly higher proportion of sales with an increase in the budget for preserved mushrooms. On the other hand, the proposition was tested that consumers show greater preference for products in brine with an increase in the budget for preserved mushrooms on the premise that these products are more versatile and attractive to a younger and richer cohort of shoppers buying the products. Evidence supports this proposition and thus an advantage lies with the Chinese producers who supply mushrooms using the brine-preserving medium. Finally, significant and positive cross-price elasticities of demand were confirmed between domestic and imported brands, suggesting that Chinese imports do compete with domestic products on price.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodgers, Trudi & Fleming, Euan M. & Villano, Renato A., 2006. "Analysis of Price and Product Competition from Imports in the Preserved Mushrooms Market in Australia," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139893, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare06:139893
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/139893/files/2006_rodgers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.139893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare06:139893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.