Beyond the Price: How Non-Pecuniary Boomerang Effects Undermine Corrective Food Taxes
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404572
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Gamage, David & Shanske, Darien, 2011. "Three Essays On Tax Salience: Market Salience and Political Salience," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt8gf0b1cj, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
- Arne Risa Hole, 2007. "Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(3), pages 388-401, September.
- Raj Chetty & Adam Looney & Kory Kroft, 2009.
"Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1145-1177, September.
- Raj Chetty & Adam Looney & Kory Kroft, 2007. "Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 13330, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Raj Chetty & Kory Kroft & Adam Looney, 2009. "Salience and taxation: theory and evidence," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2009-11, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- Looney, Adam & Kroft, Kory & Chetty, Raj, 2009. "Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence," Scholarly Articles 9748525, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Penn, Jerrod & Hu, Wuyang, 2019. "Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: A meta-analysis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 22-35.
- Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019.
"Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1557-1626.
- Hunt Allcott & Benjamin Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Regressive Sin Taxes, With an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax," NBER Working Papers 25841, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Cornelsen, Laura & Quaife, Matthew & Lagarde, Mylene & Smith, Richard D., 2020. "Framing and signalling effects of taxes on sugary drinks: a discrete choice experiment among households in Great Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105777, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
- Rebecca L. C. Taylor & Scott Kaplan & Sofia B. Villas‐Boas & Kevin Jung, 2019.
"Soda Wars: The Effect Of A Soda Tax Election On University Beverage Sales,"
Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(3), pages 1480-1496, July.
- Taylor, Rebecca & Kaplan, Scott & Villas-Boas, Sofia B. & Jung, Kevin, 2019. "Soda Wars: The Effect of a Soda Tax Election on University Beverage Sales," 2019 Conference (63rd), February 12-15, 2019, Melbourne, Australia 285049, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES).
- Taylor, Rebecca LC & Kaplan, Scott & Villas‐Boas, Sofia B & Jung, Kevin, 2019. "Soda Wars: The Effect Of A Soda Tax Election On University Beverage Sales," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt1m55f21s, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
- Jason M. Fletcher & David Frisvold & Nathan Tefft, 2010. "Can Soft Drink Taxes Reduce Population Weight?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 28(1), pages 23-35, January.
- Chen, Xiu & Kaiser, Harry M. & Rickard, Bradley J., 2015. "The impacts of inclusive and exclusive taxes on healthy eating: An experimental study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 13-24.
- Finkelstein, Eric A. & Zhen, Chen & Bilger, Marcel & Nonnemaker, James & Farooqui, Assad M. & Todd, Jessica E., 2013. "Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 219-239.
- Train,Kenneth E., 2009.
"Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation,"
Cambridge Books,
Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
- Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
- Kenneth Train, 2003. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Online economics textbooks, SUNY-Oswego, Department of Economics, number emetr2.
- Jakina Debnam, 2017.
"Selection Effects and Heterogeneous Demand Responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax Vote,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1172-1187.
- Debnam, Jakina, 2016. "Selection Effects and Heterogeneous Demand Responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax Vote," 2017 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2017, Chicago, Illinois 250110, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
- Jacob Goldin & Tatiana Homonoff, 2013.
"Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Cigarette Tax Salience and Regressivity,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 302-336, February.
- Jacob Goldin & Tatiana Homonoff, 2010. "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Cigarette Tax Salience and Regressivity," Working Papers 1278, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
- Jacob Goldin & Tatiana Homonoff, 2011. "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Cigarette Tax Salience and Regressivity," Working Papers 561a, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
- Laura Cornelsen & Matthew Quaife & Mylene Lagarde & Richard D. Smith, 2020. "Framing and signalling effects of taxes on sugary drinks: A discrete choice experiment among households in Great Britain," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1132-1147, October.
- Zhai, Tianchang & Li, Lei & Wang, Jingjing & Si, Wei, 2022. "Will the consumption tax on sugar-sweetened beverages help promote healthy beverage consumption? Evidence from urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Wang, Jingbin & Hu, Wuyang & Li, Jian & Qing, Ping, 2025. "Balancing Health and Market Effectiveness in Food Corrective Taxation: Evidence from Variations in Sugar Tax Salience," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360886, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
- Lee, Gyuchan, 2026. "Sin Tax Salience under Tax-Inclusive Pricing: Experimental Evidence on Informational Effects of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404547, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
- Sunjin Ahn & Jayson L. Lusk, 2021. "Non‐Pecuniary Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 53-69, January.
- Hoy, Kyle A. & Wrenn, Douglas H., 2020. "The effectiveness of taxes in decreasing candy purchases," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
- Xiong, Hang & Hu, Wuyang & Xu, Meng & Zhan, Jintao, 2024. "Revisiting heterogenous social desirability bias in consumer willingness to pay for food carbon label: Social norms and environmental concerns," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
- John Cawley & David Frisvold & David Jones & Chelsea Lensing, 2021. "The Pass‐Through of a Tax on Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages in Boulder, Colorado," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 987-1005, May.
- Wilson, Norbert L. W. & Zheng, Yuqing & Burney, Shaheer & Kaiser, Harry M., 2016.
"Do Grocery Food Sales Taxes Cause Food Insecurity?,"
2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts
235324, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
- Wilson, Norbert L. W. & Zheng, Yuqing & Burney, Shaheer & Kaiser, Harry, 2017. "Do Grocery (Food Sales) Taxes Cause Food Insecurity?," Working Paper series 290135, University of Connecticut, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
- Gonçalves, Judite & Pereira dos Santos, João, 2020.
"Brown sugar, how come you taste so good? The impact of a soda tax on prices and consumption,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
- João Pereira dos Santos & Judite Gonçalves, 2019. "Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good? The impact of a soda tax on prices and consumption," GEE Papers 00124, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Aug 2019.
- Francesca Barigozzi & Laura Cornelsen & Mario Mazzocchi, 2025. "A tax is a signal: theory and evidence," Working Papers wp1206, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Martin O'Connell & Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith, 2022.
"The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research,"
Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 723-745, August.
- Dubois, Pierre & Griffith, Rachel & O'Connell, Martin, 2022. "The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 16954, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
- Dubois, Pierre & Griffith, Rachel & O'Connell, Martin, 2022. "The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research," TSE Working Papers 22-1286, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith & Martin O'Connell, 2022. "The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research," Post-Print hal-03770614, HAL.
- Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith & Martin O'Connell, 2026. "The use of scanner data for economics research," Working Papers hal-05505406, HAL.
- Jiale Bao & Hongsha Wang & Qihui Chen, 2025. "Can We-Media Help Reduce the Consumption of Sugary Fruit Juice Drinks With the Presence of the Halo Effect?—Insights From A Discrete Choice Experiment in Beijing, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
- Byambadorj, Nyamdavaa & Best, Rohan & Mandakh, Undram & Sinha, Kompal, 2025. "Parental beverage choices to inform policy on sugar-sweetened beverages: a discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
- Pourya Valizadeh & Shu Wen Ng, 2021. "Would A National Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Tax in the United States Be Well Targeted?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 961-986, May.
- Wolff, François-Charles & Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre & Trouillet, Brice & Pigeault, Alexia & Rollo, Nicolas, 2026.
"Participatory democracy in question: The case of “the sea in debate”,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
- François-Charles Wolff & Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Brice Trouillet & Alexia Pigeault & Nicolas Rollo, 2026. "Participatory democracy in question: The case of “the sea in debate”," Post-Print hal-05473955, HAL.
- Blake, Miranda R. & Lancsar, Emily & Peeters, Anna & Backholer, Kathryn, 2019. "Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 98-107.
- Fabrice Etilé, 2019.
"The Economics of Diet and Obesity: Public Policy,"
Post-Print
hal-02154445, HAL.
- Fabrice Etilé, 2019. "The Economics of Diet and Obesity: Public Policy," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-02154445, HAL.
- Rebecca L. C. Taylor, 2022. "It's in the bag? The effect of plastic carryout bag bans on where and what people purchase to eat," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(5), pages 1563-1584, October.
- Sebastien Bradley & Naomi E. Feldman, 2020.
"Hidden Baggage: Behavioral Responses to Changes in Airline Ticket Tax Disclosure,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 58-87, November.
- Sebastien Bradley & Naomi E. Feldman, 2018. "Hidden Baggage : Behavioral Responses to Changes in Airline Ticket Tax Disclosure," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-057, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- Zhang, Tong & Hu, Wuyang & Zhu, Zhanguo & Penn, Jerrod, 2023. "Consumer preference for food products addressing multiple dimensions of poverty: Evidence from China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
- Samare P. I. Huls & Emily Lancsar & Bas Donkers & Jemimah Ride, 2022. "Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2630-2647, December.
More about this item
Keywords
;NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-EXP-2026-08-24 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HEA-2026-08-24 (Health Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404572.html