IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404538.html

How Huanglongbing Disease Reshapes the Consumption of U.S. Orange Juice

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yi
  • Soto-Caro, Ariel
  • Guan, Zhengfei

Abstract

Huanglongbing (HLB, or citrus greening) has devastated Florida’s orange groves since its detection in 2005, reducing Florida orange production by more than 95% by 2024 and cutting U.S. per-capita orange juice (OJ) availability by 60% over two decades. This paper provides the first structural analysis of how HLB propagates through a branded, differentiatedproduct supply chain to reach final consumers. We use Nielsen Retail Scanner data and Consumer Panel data, combined with an HLB severity index. The demand model follows the Berry–Levinsohn–Pakes (BLP) random-coefficients logit framework, allowing the HLB severity index to shift the perceived quality of domestic OJ products relative to imported alternatives within the same market and period. A multi-product Bertrand–Nash supply model traces how the disease raises domestic processing costs and how frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) imports partially buffer the price shock. A household-level two-part model further separates extensive-margin category exit from intensive-margin reduction and tests for persistent demand destruction through a discrete-time hazard analysis. Counterfactual simulations decompose the total OJ consumption decline into a price channel, a non-price quality channel, a healthpreference trend, and an import-buffer offset. The results are expected to show that HLB-related price and quality effects together explain the majority of the consumption decline, that imports provide only partial relief, that NFC products bear a disproportionate quality loss, and that a share of household category exit is permanent.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yi & Soto-Caro, Ariel & Guan, Zhengfei, 2026. "How Huanglongbing Disease Reshapes the Consumption of U.S. Orange Juice," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404538, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404538
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404538/files/177554_192662_115232_HLB_OJ_AAEA_sub_yi_06012026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Céline Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra‐Mechemache & Hugo Molina, 2025. "The Buyer Power Effect of Retail Mergers: An Empirical Model of Bargaining with Equilibrium of Fear," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 56(2), pages 194-215, June.
    2. Volker Nocke & Nicolas Schutz, 2018. "Multiproduct‐Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 523-557, March.
    3. Reynaert, Mathias & Verboven, Frank, 2014. "Improving the performance of random coefficients demand models: The role of optimal instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 83-98.
    4. Ariel Singerman & Pilar Useche, 2019. "The Role of Strategic Uncertainty in Area-wide Pest Management Decisions of Florida Citrus Growers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(4), pages 991-1011.
    5. Chen Zhen & Ian F. Brissette & Ryan Richard Ruff, 2014. "By Ounce or by Calorie: The Differential Effects of Alternative Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Strategies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1070-1083.
    6. Suh, Dong Hee & Guan, Zhengfei & Khachatryan, Hayk, . "The impact of Mexican competition on the U.S. strawberry industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4).
    7. Peyton Ferrier & Chen Zhen, 2014. "The producer welfare effects of trade liberalization when goods are perishable and habit-forming: the case of asparagus," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 129-141, March.
    8. Ariel Soto‐Caro & Feng Wu & Tian Xia & Zhengfei Guan, 2023. "Demand analysis with structural changes: Model and application to the US blueberry market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1116, October.
    9. Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1557-1626.
    10. Sergio H. Lence & Ariel Singerman, 2023. "When does voluntary coordination work? Evidence from area‐wide pest management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 243-264, January.
    11. Steven T. Berry, 1994. "Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 25(2), pages 242-262, Summer.
    12. Christopher Conlon & Jeff Gortmaker, 2020. "Best practices for differentiated products demand estimation with PyBLP," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 1108-1161, December.
    13. Dong, Diansheng & Stewart, Hayden & Byrne, Anne T. & Saavoss, Monica, 2024. "Citrus greening, retail fruit prices, and household welfare: A demand system approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 407-426, December.
    14. Ariel Singerman & Pilar Useche, 2019. "“The Role of Strategic Uncertainty in Area-Wide Pest Management Decisions of Florida Citrus Growers” – Authors’ Response to Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1017-1020.
    15. Michael J. Roberts & Wolfram Schlenker, 2013. "Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2265-2295, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brett Hollenbeck & Kosuke Uetake, 2021. "Taxation and market power in the legal marijuana industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(3), pages 559-595, September.
    2. Mayer, Thierry & Head, Keith, 2021. "Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared," CEPR Discussion Papers 16762, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Øyvind Thomassen & Howard Smith & Stephan Seiler & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2017. "Multi-category Competition and Market Power: A Model of Supermarket Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(8), pages 2308-2351, August.
    4. Greg Lewis & Bora Ozaltun & Georgios Zervas, 2021. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Differentiated Products Demand Systems," Papers 2111.12397, arXiv.org.
    5. Wang, Ao, 2023. "Sieve BLP: A semi-nonparametric model of demand for differentiated products," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 325-351.
    6. Jorge Alé-Chilet & Cuicui Chen & Jing Li & Mathias Reynaert, 2026. "Colluding Against Environmental Regulation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 93(1), pages 35-71.
    7. In Kyung Kim & Kyoo il Kim, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Choice: Lessons from the Milk Boycott," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 5625-5644, July.
    8. Limin Fang, 2022. "The Effects of Online Review Platforms on Restaurant Revenue, Consumer Learning, and Welfare," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8116-8143, November.
    9. Mogens Fosgerau & Julien Monardo & André de Palma, 2024. "The Inverse Product Differentiation Logit Model," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 329-370, November.
    10. Dearing, Adam, 2022. "Estimating structural demand and supply models using tax rates as instruments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Wang, Ao, 2021. "A BLP Demand Model of Product-Level Market Shares with Complementarity," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1351, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    12. Lu, Zhentong & Shi, Xiaoxia & Tao, Jing, 2023. "Semi-nonparametric estimation of random coefficients logit model for aggregate demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2245-2265.
    13. Steven T. Berry & Philip A. Haile, 2021. "Foundations of Demand Estimation," NBER Working Papers 29305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Matthew Backus & Christopher Conlon & Michael Sinkinson, 2021. "Common Ownership and Competition in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," NBER Working Papers 28350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Susan J. Méndez, 2018. "Parallel trade of pharmaceuticals: The Danish market for statins," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 333-356, February.
    16. Lapo Filistrucchi & Tobias J. Klein, 2013. "Price Competition in Two-Sided Markets with Heterogeneous Consumers and Network Effects," Working Papers 13-20, NET Institute.
    17. Takanori Adachi & Michal Fabinger, 2017. "Multi-Dimensional Pass-Through, Incidence, and the Welfare Burden of Taxation in Oligopoly," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1040, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    18. Felix Montag, 2023. "Mergers, Foreign Competition, and Jobs: Evidence from the U.S. Appliance Industry," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 378, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    19. Huo, Jinghai & Dua, Rubal & Bansal, Prateek, 2024. "Inverse product differentiation logit model: Holy grail or not?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Stépahne Auray & Nicolas Lepage-Saucier & Purevdorj Tuvaandor, 2018. "Doubly Robust GMM Inference and Differentiated Products Demand Models," Working Papers 2018-13, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.