IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404528.html

The Tainted Truth Effect in Food Innovation: Evidence on Information Credibility and Willingness to Pay for Cultured Meat in Chinese Urban Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Haotian
  • Liu, Yuanyuan

Abstract

China is at a critical stage of dietary structure upgrading and food system transformation. Traditional livestock production has resulted in a significant carbon footprint in China’s meat supply chain. Cultured meat is considered an emerging alternative protein source to maintain the meat consumption experience and potentially reducing carbon footprints. However, consumers’ willingness to pay for cultured meat is also influenced by surrounding environmental information. This study explores whether information credibility increases Chinese urban consumers’ willingness to pay for cultured meat. Using 1262 survey questionnaires from four major international consumer cities in China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chongqing), we divided the respondents into three groups based on information credibility and used a Double-bound Contingent Valuation method. The results show that Chinese urban consumers are generally willing to pay a premium for level AA certification label, high protein content, and low carbon footprint cultured meat, but the magnitude of willingness to pay depends on the information consumers receive. Importantly, respondents in the no information group showed the highest average willingness to pay. All information prompts consumers to conduct cautious and risk-aware evaluations, while insufficient information (Tainted Truth Effect) introduces credibility ambiguity, weakening consumers' reliance on factual details. This study has significant implications for evaluating the feasibility of China’s diversified food security strategy, Big Food View and demand-side low-carbon consumption policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Haotian & Liu, Yuanyuan, 2026. "The Tainted Truth Effect in Food Innovation: Evidence on Information Credibility and Willingness to Pay for Cultured Meat in Chinese Urban Consumers," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404528, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404528
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404528/files/177548_192562_115232_The_Tainted_Truth_Effect_in_Food_Innovation_Evidence_on_Information_Credibility_and_Willingness_to_Pay_for_Cultured_Meat_in_Chinese_Urban_Consumers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.