IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404527.html

Revisiting Generalized Models of Japanese Seafood Demand: A Forecast Combination Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Paudel, Susan
  • Ramsey, A. Ford

Abstract

We revisit the generalized inverse and ordinary demand systems for fish using four decades of monthly Japanese seafood data (1985–2025), a period over which the market shifted from domestic catch to heavy import dependence. The earlier consensus no longer holds. The ordinary specification is rejected under every instrument set, but the inverse specification is also rejected when the full set of instruments is used, so the preferred model depends on which instruments are chosen. Additionally, lag and macroeconomic instruments that once identified the supply side have also lost most of their explanatory power. Together these results indicate that the structure of the market has changed and that a single demand model may no longer describe the market well. Faced with the model selection uncertainty, we examine whether combining the competing forecasts is preferable to selecting one. Using unconditional rolling-window forecasts and a range of combination methods, we find that no single model forecasts best at every horizon, while the combinations are at least as accurate as the individual models and never as poor as the weakest among them. The gains from combination are small, because the demand systems are very similar yielding similarl forecasts. Combination therefore offers a reliable hedge against choosing the wrong model, even where it does not clearly improve on the best one

Suggested Citation

  • Paudel, Susan & Ramsey, A. Ford, 2026. "Revisiting Generalized Models of Japanese Seafood Demand: A Forecast Combination Approach," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404527, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404527
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404527/files/177546_192557_115232_AAEA2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, Graham & Gargano, Antonio & Timmermann, Allan, 2013. "Complete subset regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 357-373.
    2. James Eales & Catherine Durham & Cathy R. Wessells, 1997. "Generalized Models of Japanese Demand for Fish," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1153-1163.
    3. Kentaka Aruga & Hiroki Wakamatsu, 2024. "Investigating the Consumption Patterns of Japanese Seafood during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-15, May.
    4. H. Allen Klaiber & Matthew T. Holt, 2010. "The Role of Theoretical Restrictions in Forecasting with Inverse Demand Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(1), pages 70-85.
    5. Guggenberger, Patrik, 2010. "The Impact Of A Hausman Pretest On The Asymptotic Size Of A Hypothesis Test," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 369-382, April.
    6. Douglas Staiger & James H. Stock, 1997. "Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 557-586, May.
    7. Aksu, Celal & Gunter, Sevket I., 1992. "An empirical analysis of the accuracy of SA, OLS, ERLS and NRLS combination forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 27-43, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woutersen, Tiemen & Hausman, Jerry A., 2019. "Increasing the power of specification tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 166-175.
    2. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic Data," MPRA Paper 106408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Liu, Chu-An, 2015. "Distribution theory of the least squares averaging estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 142-159.
    4. Firmin Doko Tchatoka & Wenjie Wang, 2020. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity," Adelaide Economics Working Papers 2020-05, Adelaide University, School of Economics.
    5. McCloskey, Adam, 2017. "Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 17-35.
    6. Firmin Doko Tchatoka, 2015. "On bootstrap validity for specification tests with weak instruments," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(1), pages 137-146, February.
    7. Wang, Wenjie & Doko Tchatoka, Firmin, 2018. "On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson–Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 188-211.
    8. Kiviet, Jan F. & Pleus, Milan, 2017. "The performance of tests on endogeneity of subsets of explanatory variables scanned by simulation," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 1-21.
    9. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2025. "Exogeneity tests and weak identification in IV regressions: Asymptotic theory and point estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Size-corrected Bootstrap Test after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic or Clustered Data," MPRA Paper 110899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Guo, Zijian & Kang, Hyunseung & Cai, T. Tony & Small, Dylan S., 2018. "Testing endogeneity with high dimensional covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 175-187.
    12. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2024. "Weak-Identification-Robust Bootstrap Tests after Pretesting for Exogeneity," MPRA Paper 123060, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2020. "Exogeneity tests, incomplete models, weak identification and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 390-418.
    14. Chu‐An Liu & Biing‐Shen Kuo, 2016. "Model averaging in predictive regressions," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(2), pages 203-231, June.
    15. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2025. "Identification-Robust Two-Stage Bootstrap Tests with Pretesting for Exogeneity," MPRA Paper 125017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Averi Chakrabarti & Karen A Grépin & Stéphane Helleringer, 2019. "The impact of supplementary immunization activities on routine vaccination coverage: An instrumental variable analysis in five low-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Akyol, Pelin & Nolan, Matt, 2025. "Effects of informal caring on labour market outcomes of carers: Evidence from HILDA," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Nicola Campigotto & Chiara Rapallini & Aldo Rustichini, 2022. "School friendship networks, homophily and multiculturalism: evidence from European countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 1687-1722, October.
    19. Wei, Shang-Jin & Wu, Yi, 2001. "Globalization and Inequality: Evidence from within China," CEPR Discussion Papers 3088, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Martin T. Robson & Colin Wren, 1999. "Marginal and Average Tax Rates and the Incentive for Self‐Employment," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(4), pages 757-773, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.