IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404522.html

Consumer Perceptions and Olive Oil Choice: An Integrated Machine-Learning Approach for Measurement, Segmentation, and Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Youmin

Abstract

For agricultural food economic studies, rich survey instruments capture meaningful heterogeneity, but conventional empirical specifications can become sensitive to co-linearity and endogeneity. This study recognized how consumer perceptions shape olive oil consumption choices, combining unsupervised learning for data quality and structure detection with supervised models for prediction and inference. Using exploratory factor analysis to condense multi-item perception constructs, clustering to identify respondent archetypes and remove low-quality responses, and penalized models ensembles to predict consumption preference, we quantify (i) which perceptions matter most (EFA-PCA), (ii) how effects vary across consumer segments (Cluster and SEM), and (iii) out-of-sample performance under K-fold cross-validation. Results indicate that quality perceptions, taste imagery and price sensitivity are the dominant drivers, with heterogeneity across income and region.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Youmin, 2026. "Consumer Perceptions and Olive Oil Choice: An Integrated Machine-Learning Approach for Measurement, Segmentation, and Prediction," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404522, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404522
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404522/files/177542_195181_115232_Youmin_AAEA_ML.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus G. Grunert, 2005. "Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(3), pages 369-391, September.
    2. Brunsø, Karen & Fjord, Thomas Ahle & Grunert, Klaus G., 2002. "Consumers' food choice and quality perception," MAPP Working Papers 77, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    3. Caputo, Vincenzina & Lusk, Jayson L., 2022. "The Basket-Based Choice Experiment: A Method for Food Demand Policy Analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberta Sisto & Giustina Pellegrini & Piermichele La Sala, 2019. "Dual quality food: A negative social externality or a competitiveness opportunity?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(7), pages 307-313.
    2. Grunert, Klaus G., 2006. "How changes in consumer behaviour and retailing affect competence requirements for food producers and processors," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20.
    3. Tingqiang Chen & Lei Wang & Jining Wang & Qi Yang, 2017. "A Network Diffusion Model of Food Safety Scare Behavior considering Information Transparency," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, December.
    4. von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Spiller, Achim, 2014. "“Sustainability” a semi-globalisable concept for international food marketing - Consumer expectations regarding sustainable food – An explorative survey in industrialised and emerging countries," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 182513, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    5. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Admassu, Samuel A., 2009. "Assessing consumer preferences for quality and safety attributes of food in the absence of official standards: the case of beef in Ethiopia," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50120, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Hattori, Keisuke & Higashida, Keisaku, 2014. "Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Ilona De Hooge & Pegah Amani & Tino Bech-Larsen & Marije Oostindjer, 2015. "Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Meyer, Christian H. & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2010. "Customer Communication of Regional Quality Efforts: A Case From the Grain Sector," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100595, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    9. Pérez-Mesa, Juan Carlos & Sanchez-Fernández, Raquel & Serrano-Arcos, Mar, 2019. "Measuring the impact of crises in the horticultural sector: The case of Spain," MPRA Paper 119854, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Granato, Giulia & Fischer, Arnout R.H. & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2022. "“Misalignments between users and designers as source of inspiration: A novel hybrid method for physical new product development”," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    12. Yunwei Li & Qiuping Ji & Vivian Valdmanis & Jingqi Li & Guanrou Deng & Rui Guo & Yu Hao & Yu Hao, 2026. "Fear from Eating Outside? Assessing The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Consumer’s Willingness to Utilize Catering Services in China," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 29(1), pages 147-176, February.
    13. Naphtal Habiyaremye & Nadhem Mtimet & Emily A. Ouma & Gideon A. Obare, 2023. "Consumers' willingness to pay for safe and quality milk: Evidence from experimental auctions in Rwanda," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1049-1074, October.
    14. Sanjoy Kumar Roy & Amena Khatun, 2024. "Influencing factors for ready-to-cook food purchase intentions: a two-stage approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-31, January.
    15. Dentoni, Domenico & English, Francis & Schwarz, Daniela, . "The Impact of Public R&D on Marketing and Supply Chains on Small Farms’ Market Sensing Capability: Evidence from the Australian Seafood Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    16. Jan Mei Soon-Sinclair & Thanh Mai Ha & Iwan Vanany & Mark Raguindin Limon & Wandee Sirichokchatchawan & Ikarastika Rahayu Abdul Wahab & Ruhil Hayati Hamdan & Mohd Hafiz Jamaludin, 2024. "Consumers’ perceptions of food fraud in selected Southeast Asian countries: a cross sectional study," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(1), pages 65-77, February.
    17. Fitzsimmons, Jill Ann & Colantuoni, Francesca & Cicia, Gianni & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2014. "Human Values and Consumer Preferences for Extrinsic Credence Attributes in the German and Italian Markets for New Potatoes," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170672, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Djamel Rahmani & Zein Kallas & Maria Pappa & José Maria Gil, 2019. "Are Consumers’ Egg Preferences Influenced by Animal-Welfare Conditions and Environmental Impacts?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Islam, S.M. Fakhrul & Jabbar, Mohammad A., 2010. "Consumer preferences and demand for livestock products in urban Bangladesh," Research Reports 97972, International Livestock Research Institute.
    20. Brian Innes & John Cranfield, 2009. "Consumer preference for production-derived quality: analyzing perceptions of premium chicken production methods," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 395-411.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.