IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404437.html

Cleanup Delay and Second-Best Environmental Policy: Structural Estimates from Texas Oil & Gas Wells

Author

Listed:
  • Agerton, Mark
  • Beatty, Lauren
  • Cruz Figueroa Garcia, Diogenes

Abstract

Environmental remediation yields no direct profit for producers, making delay privately rational and resulting in an externalization of the environmental costs of inaction, such as methane leaks and risk of groundwater contamination. There is option value to delaying plugging, however, if there is an expectation of future higher prices. Using data from the Railroad Commission of Texas, we estimate a discretetime dynamic discrete choice model of well production, shut-in, and plugging decisions. We recover the structural costs of shut-in maintenance, plugging and abandonment, and well reactivation for both oil and gas wells. We use these estimates to evaluate counterfactual policies, including plugging subsidies, idling taxes, capacity-based plugging mandate and time-based idling limits, that aim to accelerate the abandonment of unproductive wells.

Suggested Citation

  • Agerton, Mark & Beatty, Lauren & Cruz Figueroa Garcia, Diogenes, 2026. "Cleanup Delay and Second-Best Environmental Policy: Structural Estimates from Texas Oil & Gas Wells," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404437, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404437
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404437/files/177508_193975_115232_OrphanWellsContsTimeDCDP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costanza, Robert & Perrings, Charles, 1990. "A flexible assurance bonding system for improved environmental management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 57-75, April.
    2. Rust, John, 1987. "Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(5), pages 999-1033, September.
    3. Lucija Muehlenbachs, 2015. "A Dynamic Model Of Cleanup: Estimating Sunk Costs In Oil And Gas Production," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(1), pages 155-185, February.
    4. Yang, Peifang & Davis, Graham A., 2018. "Non-renewable resource extraction under financial incentives to reduce and reverse stock pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 282-299.
    5. Lucija Muehlenbachs, 2015. "A Dynamic Model Of Cleanup: Estimating Sunk Costs In Oil And Gas Production," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 155-185, February.
    6. Martin L. Weitzman, 1974. "Prices vs. Quantities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(4), pages 477-491.
    7. Soren T. Anderson & Ryan Kellogg & Stephen W. Salant, 2018. "Hotelling under Pressure," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(3), pages 984-1026.
    8. Rice, Patricia & Smith, V. Kerry, 1977. "An econometric model of the petroleum industry," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 263-287, November.
    9. Stavins, Robert N., 1996. "Correlated Uncertainty and Policy Instrument Choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 218-232, March.
    10. V. Joseph Hotz & Robert A. Miller, 1993. "Conditional Choice Probabilities and the Estimation of Dynamic Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 497-529.
    11. Caputo, Michael R & Wilen, James E, 1995. "Optimal Cleanup of Hazardous Wastes," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 36(1), pages 217-243, February.
    12. Lappi, Pauli, 2018. "Optimal clean-up of polluted sites," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    13. Gerard, David, 2000. "The law and economics of reclamation bonds," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 189-197, December.
    14. Lucas W. Davis, 2015. "Policy Monitor—Bonding Requirements for U.S. Natural Gas Producers," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(1), pages 128-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aghakazemjourabbaf, Sara & Insley, Margaret, 2021. "Leaving your tailings behind: Environmental bonds, bankruptcy and waste cleanup," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Lappi, Pauli, 2020. "A model of optimal extraction and site reclamation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Kim, Byung-Cheol & Oliver, Matthew E., 2017. "Taming drillers through legislative action: Evidence from Pennsylvania’s shale gas industry," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 15-35.
    4. Jarmo Jääskeläinen & Pauli Lappi, 2025. "Restoring the commons: optimizing the restoration of natural assets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 80(4), pages 989-1039, December.
    5. Weber, Jeremy G. & Ercoli, Thomas & Fitzgerald, Will & Nied, Paige & Penderville, Molly & Raabe, Eric, 2021. "Identifying the end: Minimum production thresholds for natural gas wells," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Simone Marsiglio & Nahid Masoudi, 2022. "Reclamation of a resource extraction site: A differential game approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 770-802, July.
    7. Lappi, Pauli, 2020. "On optimal extraction under asymmetric information over reclamation costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Galay, Gregory & Winter, Jennifer, 2025. "No end in sight: End-of-life management of oil wells in Alberta," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Sara Aghakazemjourabbaf & Margaret Insley, 2018. "Optimal timing of harzardous waste clean-up under an environmental bond an a strict liability rule," Working Papers 1803, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised 06 Jan 2018.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:3e9xk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Yang, Peifang & Davis, Graham A., 2021. "Why don't environmental bonds fully cover reclamation costs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Insley, Margaret, 2025. "Environmental bonds and public liability for resource extraction site cleanup," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Beaudoin, Justin & Chen, Yuan & Heres, David R. & Kheiravar, Khaled H. & Lade, Gabriel E. & Yi, Fujin & Zhang, Wei & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2018. "Environmental Policies in the Transportation Sector: Taxes, Subsidies, Mandates, Restrictions, and Investment," ISU General Staff Papers 201808150700001050, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Victor Aguirregabiria, 2006. "Another Look at the Identification of Dynamic Discrete Decision Processes: With an Application to Retirement Behavior," 2006 Meeting Papers 169, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    15. John Stranlund, 2015. "A Note on Correlated Uncertainty and Hybrid Environmental Policies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(4), pages 463-476, August.
    16. Maria Casanova-Rivas, 2008. "Dynamic Complementarities: A Computational and Empirical Analysis of Couples' Retirement Decisions," 2008 Meeting Papers 1073, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Andreas Lanz & Gregor Reich & Ole Wilms, 2022. "Adaptive grids for the estimation of dynamic models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 179-238, June.
    18. Szabolcs Lorincz, 2005. "Persistence Effects in a Dynamic Discrete Choice Model - Application to Low-End Computer Servers," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 0510, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    19. Bruneel-Zupanc, Christophe Alain, 2021. "Discrete-Continuous Dynamic Choice Models: Identification and Conditional Choice Probability Estimation," TSE Working Papers 21-1185, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    20. Espínola-Arredondo, Ana & Muñoz-García, Félix, 2013. "When does environmental regulation facilitate entry-deterring practices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 133-152.
    21. Pizer, William A., 1999. "The optimal choice of climate change policy in the presence of uncertainty," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3-4), pages 255-287, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.